Change is coming...

If a typo based upon my error in memory is beyond your grasp, so be it. Maybe you are taking typo too literal. I'm a hunt and peck guy. Location of keys mean nothing to me. If, in my mind, I formulate a word and type it wrong, thinking it's correct, it's a typo when all said and done. Spelling is not my strong suit and you want to rake me over the coals because of your background. I guess you must think that everyone majored in English.

Thanks for the good luck on my teams but I'm actually on a best ever roll. Three championships in a row with the forth in the finals right now(ATG). Not counting the current finals team, I have four champs, two lost finals and two missed playoffs out of eight teams.

A typo based on memory is not beyond my grasp. I just know now that wasn't the case with you. And a "typo" is a "typo;" I didn't take it too literal. A "typo" is a typing mistake, not a misspelling of an entire word. You know that as well as I do.

I'm not '"raking you over the coals," you just keep failing to answer these two vital questions:

1.Why don't you explain to me why you first said you made a typo, then said you had an error of memory, then said you made a typo again. Please explain these contradictions. If you can't, you lied.

2.Also, please explain how you keep typing "c" when it is nowhere near the "t" and "h" keys. Even if you hunt and peck, why would you hit the "c"? You need to explain that, too, or your lie is proven.

If you made a typo based on memory, you would be able to answer these two questions and show how you did. You didn't and clearly can't. As I said before, the truth of the matter is obvious.

Badjam, I wonder if your keyboard mapping needs a reset, those are some interesting typos

Wow, you are slow.
It is not a contradiction. There is a c in stretcher. The more common word. Your fake SOM name is not exactly stretcher so I typed it how I pictured it in my mind. I am starting to think that your inability to socially interact with others, without them viewing you as arrogant or condescending, is based upon your inability to allow yourself to be able to follow a line of thinking that is not the same as yours. I guess you would not make a very good psychologist because of your rigid viewpoints and thought process.

I am really surprised that you would lower yourself to the junior high style of calling someone a liar just because of your inability to intellectually get yourself on the same page as other people's line of thinking. You seem to fit the stereotypical mold of being extremely book smart but somewhat socially challenged.

Badjam, give him a chance he's busy tonight, lecturing Chess and Voovits in the mystery tournament thread as well as you here tonight. And Radagast just had a typo so you may fall to 4th in line.

LOL

Badjam, give him a chance he's busy tonight, lecturing Chess and Voovits in the mystery tournament thread as well as you here tonight. And Radagast just had a typo so you may fall to 4th in line.

LOL

Oh no... not a misspelled word! I hope it doesn't take three pages for him to comprehend how us mere mortals can type a word wrong. Hopefully Radagast didn't spell strethers name wrong! It could be a long night.

Wow, you are slow.
It is not a contradiction. There is a c in stretcher. The more common word. Your fake SOM name is not exactly stretcher so I typed it how I pictured it in my mind.

Wow, you are predictable. That is a very lame excuse...and don't project your ample slowness on to me.

Even if you were typing "stretcher," your excuses still contradicted themselves. So you had to be lying once. Even if you did make a "typo," there is no way you would make the same one again and again and again. So, nice try. As I said before, the truth of your mendacity is clear. You have spent three pages trying to cover up a lie, instead of admitting it like a grown up. That says a lot about you.

Also, the only junior "high schooler" is you. Everytime you lose an argument--which happens a lot--you fall back on childish, erroneous personal attacks. That says a lot about your poor social interactions and why you project them onto me. You also have to get over the insecurity of dealing with someone better educated than you in rhetoric and argument. I know your insecure, semi-educated eyes see those with better arguments as "arrogant" and ""condescending," but you have to get over that. Considering all the arguments you've lost to me, I thought you'd have learned that by now...

So, I'm exactly where I was in my last post. I'm confident knowing the truth of the matter...and I even forgive you.

You can base that on your failure to understand, not my failure to explain. Go ahead and ask anyone that has read this thread. You will find that you are alone in your inability to comprehend.

Again, you are not as socially educated as you are educated in your curriculum. I never mentioned your family, friends, and colleagues, you may want to read my post again, as you are misreading or not comprehending. Your family, friends, and colleagues, know you. They know your strengths and weaknesses and roll with it. Your social ineptitude is with dealing with people you don't know. Surprised a person of your intellect fails to grasp this.

Normally, when people that post here have different viewpoints, it doesn't take pages of spoon feeding to explain their line of thinking.

I am not attacking you. I am analyzing why you miss the point so often on other posters viewpoints. You expose your strengths and weaknesses because of your multiple posts. You have some extreme intellectual qualities but are reluctant to admit you have areas of weakness. Your are misunderstood often on these forums and this is basically because of your failure to be able to extract conversation out of people without coming across as authoritative.

I simply misspelled your name. Even now, I have to go back to make sure I got it correct when typing it because it just doesn't flow like most words I type. Why you take it personally is unknown. I misspelled a fake name you made up and you just can't let it go. To me though, is that you do have solid viewpoints to offer most often but are uneasy when people have a different angle on a subject. You could be less defensive and learn and expand on other peoples posts instead of tirelessly defending every word of your posts.

Badjam, give him a chance he's busy tonight, lecturing Chess and Voovits in the mystery tournament thread as well as you here tonight. And Radagast just had a typo so you may fall to 4th in line.

LOL

Hey Robert. I'm glad you're back. You made such a hysterical fuss when you left, I was sure you'd never return. It's disappointing, though that all you can do is troll and try to deride other posters. I expected better. However, since you're going to be following me around, I look forward to engaging you on many of your posts. I'm sure I'll make more interesting comments than your trolling.