- Posts: 147
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:00 pm
J-Pav wrote:Scumby: It's not platoons either (but it definitely can be).
Edge: How about the other managers?
I will say as a disclaimer, I agree you can win in any wide variety of ways, including with Trout as your straw to stir the drink. My observation is that in 25 leagues with unique winning managers, a pattern emerged. Trout was not used. Why?
The responding managers so far are all very capable managers in their own right and I get that you can win with Trout. But what if you miss Trout in the autodraft? Is your strategy of "I need Trout to win" now mean you can't win?
I will go out on a limb and argue you can win in spite of Trout, but not because of him. There's a distinct difference.
We'll get there, I just want to stoke the fires a little more...
The question I have back is, of those 25 teams, how many were autoleagues?
I see a HUGE difference in autoleagues, how teams are made (and how they win) compared to vet driven leagues. Not that vets don't go in autoleagues as well. Just the team make up and strategies vary greatly (in my opinion) between the 2.