- Posts: 2366
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:56 pm
Sat Mar 27, 2021 6:10 am
visick wrote:geekor wrote: You can see there are LESS high priced players than in previous years. Hence my reason for a smaller cap. Again, I won't go 110, but if 6 people say they want to go up[ to 95, 97, 100, I'll change. I'm not 100% stuck at 92.
True.
But there seems to be more injuries with this set coupled with guys slanted to a side.
So ya need decent backups and/or some platoons.
Here is what I did and it may or may not be a good barometer:
Using a cap of 100M I drafted a team of the 12th and 24th ranked pitching, using Whip, which turned out to be Arizona and the WhiteSox, and hitting, using OPS, LAA and the Brewers, 12th and 24th, and I ran out of cap before I could complete the team. And as a kicker, looking at the very last ranked hitting and pitching teams, Boston and Pittsburgh, each had a very decent player or two that could have been added. As Visick said, there are a lot of high injury, L and R slanted guys, at lower $, in the $2 and $3 range. Someone do the same with 4 other teams and see what you come up with. I like 95M to 100M. Just a little more wriggle room.
