![Offline Offline](./styles/we_universal/imageset/en/icon_user_offline.png)
- Posts: 3822
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 10:31 am
l.strether wrote:Miley is a 28-yr-old solid innings-eater who has averaged 200 IP the last three three years, won 16 games two years ago, and had 3.33 and 3.55 ERAs in 2012 and 2013. He did have an off-year in 2014, but if that's "ho-hum," a lot of teams would love to have such "ho-hum" pitchers on their staff.
De La Rosa does throw hard, but he had a very unimpressive 4.54 ERA and 1.48 WHIP in his 30 games, 18 starts, and 113 IP with the Sox. He has also never shown firm command of his secondary stuff. You, apparently, think he's going to be better than Miley and Porcello, who's the same age as De La Rosa but won 15 games, had a 3.43 ERA, and a 1.23 WHIP last year. I agree he has the raw potential to be better, but I don't see him doing it. I am, though, willing to listen if you can actually make a case for it.
Miley's era the last 3 years: 3.33, 3.45, 4.34
Miley's whip last 3 years: 1.18, 1.32, 1.40
...and that's in the NL
Don't get me wrong, glad to have him as a #3, but he's trending the wrong way (except for k's). I'm hoping for the best, but my worries are that decline, the switch from NL, and his being a mid-rotation lefty pitching in Fenway.
The reason I was encouraged by de la rosa, was his success at home. I take that to mean his immaturity at the MLB level impacted his comfort levels (nerves?), and his lengthy stay in the bigs last year may help.
Like I said about Porcello previously, I'm concerned about that k-rate, and hoping 2014 was his arrival and not a blip.