blue turtle wrote:From looking at the stats for regular season career, Derek Jeter is not even Barry Larkin (don't get me wrong, I really liked Barry Larkin). But Cincinnati is not New York City, so, only baseball enthusiasts, Cincinnatians and his family are going to remember Barry Larkin while Derek Jeter is considered by some among the greats of MLB and Yankee history.
No offense, Jeter has been a HOF-worthy player, its just a little disappointing that guys who were as good (or better, imo) like Craig Biggio and Barry Larkin didn't and won't draw similar accolades for their careers.
I'm a huge Larkin fan, and, as I noted above, I'm not a Jeter adulator. However, while Larkin was a superior defender, his stats are
not superior to Jeter's. Here are their two lines:
HR RbI R BA/OBP/SLG SB
Jeter: 260 1307 1922 .310/.377/440 358
Larkin: 198 960 1329 .295/.371/.444 379
So, except for stolen bases, Jeter's offensive statistics were superior to Larkin's in these primary categories. Also, as I mentioned above, Jeter had 12 years with BA's over .300 and 12 years with OBP's over .370. Larkin, respectively, had 9 and 11. Jeter also had a superior 71.8 WAR to Larkin's 70.2
And, yes, Jeter has gotten undue adulation because he's a Yankee. However, that's an old story, and he's hardly the first. Phil Rizzuto has no place being in the HOF, and if he played for anyone but the Yankees, he wouldn't be. And all the players Olbermann mentioned like Nettles, Munson, Randolph, and O'Neill would all be footnotes if they hadn't played in pinstripes. They wouldn't be players even he cited for greatness. Until ESPN and other media stop looking at MLB as the Yankees, Red Sox, and everyone else, the Biggios, Larkins, Raines' and Kents will go overlooked.
So, we agree Jeter is not the god Yankee fans and some media make him out to be, but he is hardly the scrub some of his detractors portray him as.