Stanton's vs Hoskins Daily Baseball cards for 8/28

Stanton -Wow
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/91266/9917/1/9917

Hoskins - WTF?
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/93929/9917/1/9917

Guessing not enough of a sample size for Hoskins for his card to reflect how he has been hitting. As for Stanton...it doesn't seem like his 2017 card when it come out will look like that...I wonder why? Wow...what a card, though. You could get a nerdgasm over that card...

A perfect example of Daily's problems to me---I fielded an early team as the season started, based on actual teams so I could do no real drop adds except within that franchise.

I realized just a few games in that I had no chance as I had a bunch of guys that were priced low and over performing their previous seasons and strat would not up the card to the actual stats. My teams salary was 30-35M under the Washingtons, Chicagos etc and the under performing guys still had good to great cards.

Guessing not enough of a sample size for Hoskins for his card to reflect how he has been hitting. As for Stanton...it doesn't seem like his 2017 card when it come out will look like that...I wonder why? Wow...what a card, though. You could get a nerdgasm over that card...

That shouldn't matter. The card should reflect that Hoskins has hit 8 homeruns in 9 games. Daily Baseball is wildly inconsistent in its cards.

and reasons like that are why I don't play that game.

Extrapolating the data to the same # ab's, Rheys would have 69 HR compared to Stanton 51.

That game, like most of what SOM does, is poorly executed.

and reasons like that are why I don't play that game.

Extrapolating the data to the same # ab's, Rheys would have 69 HR compared to Stanton 51.

That game, like most of what SOM does, is poorly executed.

Updated cards as of 9/1
Stanton
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/91266/9917/1/9917
Hoskins
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/93929/9917/1/9917
But the better comparison to Hoskins is fellow rookie
Matt Olsen (who has a homer filled card)
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/93028/9917/1/9917

Guessing not enough of a sample size for Hoskins for his card to reflect how he has been hitting. As for Stanton...it doesn't seem like his 2017 card when it come out will look like that...I wonder why? Wow...what a card, though. You could get a nerdgasm over that card...

Except Matt Olsen's sample size is pretty low too.
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/93028/9917/1/9917

Hoskins hits a homerun after 21 at bats and finally gets a super card. Go figure,
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/player/939 ... 917/434469

Looks like perhaps 80-85 at-bats is the point when the card reflects actual performance to-date.