- Posts: 834
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 3:02 am
The hall of fame, if just talking about the players, are by me and many others put into 3 types: the greats, the good over a long period of time, and the greats at a particular aspect of the game.
Ruth, Cobb etc are in the 1st.
Yount would be an example of the 2nd
O. Smith a good example of the third
Voters dont really care how much a player contributes to a teams wins but rather if they were awesome at at least one thing in the game or good at many aspects of things and do it for a long time.
O. Smith made it because he was hands down an elite defensive short stop who compares with the elite of all time.
If you look at younts years there were always others who were better but he lasted long enough to accumulate all those milestones that great players reach. Just because it took him longer than so many other hall of famers doesnt really matter to the voters.
If i lasted 20 years in baseball and beat henersons stolen base records but hit 250 i would still probably make the hall.
If i stike out 8000 batters but had an era of 4 and a 500 record i would make the hall.
Be the best at at least one thing or hang around for 20 years to hit those milestones u will make the hall. Or just be great at everything for a decade and make the hall on first ballot.