- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:04 am
It was just a thought, I don't have a high emotional investment in the outcome.
My point was that bullpen's were a low priority from 1920-1955. My assumption being that the general view of relievers were as pitchers who were potential starters or failed starters- hence the low number of pitchers on the staff.
Certainly some pitchers would have good years in that role, but I'm not sure many pitchers were looking to be in that role permanently. I thought it might be interesting to have to do what most teams did, an put a potential starter in the role of reliever- since that's what most of them were.