- Posts: 477
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:15 pm
Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:22 pm
Interesting thread. Whenever I am involved with pricing a set, I am given the "ratings disk" information on the set being priced. All of my pricing is based off this raw data, which is what JTJ is referencing above. So it looks like this is a card view issue, but goodens price reflects the correct "open triangle" split.
I don't usually do a card count from the online viewer, but in this same vein there have been cards which show a different year than what was priced, etc. the ATG group is a fairly detailed oriented group and most of these issues are caught in the testing process
I don't usually do a card count from the online viewer, but in this same vein there have been cards which show a different year than what was priced, etc. the ATG group is a fairly detailed oriented group and most of these issues are caught in the testing process