- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:07 am
- Location: Usually Somewhere Else
J-Pav wrote:I did not try it in Barnstormer’s, although I probably should have, because my teams have been largely underperforming and disappointing this go around.
All three teams I posted were standard autoleagues, no themes. Not sure I buy the “better competition” theory. I know I’ve said this before, but if autoleagues are soft, then racking up rings should be easy. But that isn’t the case.
I probably should fool around with this some more, and see what can be figured out, if anything, but I have to admit my enthusiasm has been in decline for awhile.
Well, in BS Tour, the problem is winning rings yields 5 points which is huge. But winning rings is more of a crapshoot than having a good win %.
So, I would say you may be right on rings vs generic autoleague competition, but I think win % suffers more in BS tour leagues than generic autoleagues. No proof offered here though. Just my perception. At least when I look at the opponents in each (again, not wrt rings). But that is a red herring, I didn't need to mention it. Honestly I had just gotten up from a post long-run nap and maybe was punchy.
As for declining enthusiasm, yep I hear that. I have been whittling down or offloading credits for more than a month to make a clean break for a little while. Best, Frank