Sun May 22, 2016 5:45 pm
The ballpark #s are exaggerated, most especially with some great pitchers. Look at Seaver's '71 card - his best season by any reasonable metric - and then look up the hr's he gave up vs righties at home and on the road and then compare Shea's park effect hr's to the league average at baseball reference.com. Make a coherent case that those stats warrant 3# hr's against righties on his card. You won't be able to. Similar issues with Verlander in 2011 and Marichal in 1966 and most of the Palmer cards and probably several hundred others.
SOM did not do a good job with the ballpark hr's. For hitters, just look at Gehrig. There SOM overestimates the effects of Yankee stadium and takes away homeruns that he should have. Gehrig's '27 season and lifetime stats show that he hit hr's only slightly more frequently at home than on the road - and his overall career hitting and 1927 stats showed he was a much, much better hitter on the road than at Yankee stadium.
SOM screwed up the home run ballpark effects just as they screwed up clutch hitting. The 8 chances for #'s should probably be a maximum of 6 for a more accurate simulation of ball park homeruns. I don't, however, have a problem with ball park singles being 5 chances, they do screw up a lot though on denying some pitchers no ballpark singles.
I am convinced that when they come up with these innovations, such as their latest gimmick with the current cards, that Richman gets an idea, runs it by his minions who may or may not refine it, but that they don't do adequate research to ensure accuracy and don't playtest things enough to ensure playability.
Last edited by
The Last Druid on Sun May 22, 2016 6:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.