nevdully's wrote:Well I did present you with a great example of Maddux no? and btw How is it he learned Maddux is "rarely taken" " with only looking "at most" one or two lists?????
And really what I think you mean to be saying is "I don't really think its a big deal because it doesn't affect me" and "I still don't think it's a big deal even though you and others showed me how it was a big deal to them, because it doesn't affect me"
Ok, lets put it this way. Neither of what you said there applies.
I just dont understand.
I dont understand how you can say that Maddux often goes undrafted, and blame it on the info provided on the draft results page. That must mean you used the page to get that information. Otherwise that means you knew that information without using the draft results page, which I think is far more likely. Therefore the draft results page did not do any good in gathering that information.
Besides, even if the results page WAS helpful in getting that info, you would need to see many results pages before coming to that conclusion. You cant base the information that Maddux rarely gets drafted just by looking at maybe 2 different draft results. Even 3 or 4 would be too small of a sample size.
Also, for the sake of argument, lets assume I agreed with your point that the Maddux information was learned solely due to the draft results page and nothing else. How does that give an unfair advantage? If Maddux is not on peoples draft cards, it's because nobody wants him. I could care less if someone drafts a player not on my draft card. In fact, I prefer that because that increases the chances of me getting the guys I want anyway.
BTW, here's another thing I dont understand. Why would nobody want a top notch pitcher in a 100 or 200 mil league? It's not like salary is a major issue. I know I would certainly consider having him on my draft card in a high cap league.