Mon May 01, 2017 7:35 pm
(Full disclosure: I am the "offending" team here, chiming in again)
Let's keep in mind that this set encompasses all eras, including a card for Old Hoss Radbourn for a season in which he pitched 678 innings in real life. As inconceivable as some of the these results would be in the modern game, having the flexibility to mix eras and to structure teams and players in such a way as to get unusual or unconventional results is interesting to me and one of the joys of this game. "Realistic" in this context does not have very much meaning. Realistic to whom, to which era? Although deadball-era managers did not use the super-reliever strategy we see in stratomatic, it is conceivable that they could have, and this game is an opportunity to experiment with "what if" management scenarios like that and many others.
And this particular example of Murray winning 43 games is the 2nd highest win total ever across the many thousands of seasons that have been played- as extreme an outlier as they come- and so not necessarily the best example for what is wrong with the game.
That said, despite the outlying nature of this particular Murray season, this is the 3rd time I've had him win 30+ games in recent history. The card is not only undervalued - it is a mistake. The Last Druid makes the good point above that it should just be cut from the deck, because pricing it appropriately would bring its own problems, and imply that the real life Murray had an impact analogous to Babe Adams, which he did not.
I don't think additional reliever restrictions are the answer. Allowing maximum managerial freedom is what keeps this game interesting. I don't think Sutter- and Wilhelm-abuse are nearly as much of a problem, because they were great pitchers, they are priced more appropriately, and I can conceive of an alternate reality where they would be used for 250+ innings out of the pen. But I'm beginning to realize that having Murray is is essentially like getting an extra $3m for your team. Sutter and Wilhelm (and especially Adams) aren't as much like getting 2 players for the price of one, and so require more of a trade-off if you want to put that $ in your pen.
To sum up: I think it's fine to do crazy things with crazy cards, but if this one crazy card in particular is out of hand, it should just be burned, as opposed to lead to an overhaul of the rules. What is ATG for if not insane cross-generational chaos? The single season sets are for the realists; ATG is for the misfits!