Hall of Fame Ballot

I need no bigger pencil because my conclusions were dead-on. Druid made an entirely inappropriate "joke" about my wife and her professional ethics. You laughed out loud to it and called it "hysterical," which you admit. That speaks volumes about your base character. Men of character don't laugh about derisive jokes about other men's wives; you did.

And will you finally learn that "whether" is not spelled "weather." Your language skills are as laughable as your character is poor...

I need no bigger pencil because my conclusions were dead-on. Druid made an entirely inappropriate "joke" about my wife and her professional ethics. You laughed out loud to it and called it "hysterical," which you admit. That speaks volumes about your base character. Men of character don't laugh about derisive jokes about other men's wives; you did.

You actually think this joke is about professional ethics???

Hell, Id be defensive too if my comprehension level was this low.

Of course it's about professional ethics. The childish implication of the joke was my wife and I met through her job. If she had done that, she would have violated her professional ethics and code of conduct and would have lost her license. So, the joke did denigrate her professional ethics.

The fact you don't get that shows how awful your comprehension is. Since we already know you're a poorly-educated man of low character, who says "weather" instead of "whether," that isn't surprising at all...

Of course it's about professional ethics. The childish implication of the joke was my wife and I met through her job. If she had done that, she would have violated her professional ethics and code of conduct and would have lost her license. So, the joke did denigrate her professional ethics.

The fact you don't get that shows how awful your comprehension is. Since we already know you're a poorly-educated man of low character, who says "weather" instead of "whether," that isn't surprising at all...

Are you really this obtuse?
can't believe I have to explain this to you:

THE JOKE IS FUNNY BECAUSE IT IMPLIES THAT YOU WERE RECEIVING THE MENTAL TREATMENT YOU SO BADLY NEED!
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR WIFE'S ETHICS.

IF ONLY IT HAD WORKED!!!!

The only one obtuse is you. You just proved my point. You assert the joke implied I was getting treatment when I met my wife. That suggests she violated her professional ethics when she married me. So, thanks for proving my point about the joke and your "character."

If you want to make jokes about me, that's fine. Your deriding my wife by denigrating her professional ethics, however, proves what lousy character you have, which I already knew.


P.s. I'd go light on all those capital letters. They definitely suggest the one needing treatment Is you...

The only one obtuse is you. You just proved my point. You assert the joke implied I was getting treatment when I met my wife. That suggests she violated her professional ethics when she married me. So, thanks for proving my point about the joke and your "character."

If you want to make jokes about me, that's fine. Your deriding my wife by denigrating her professional ethics, however, shows proves what lousy character you have, which I already knew.


P.s. I'd go light on all those capital letters. They definitely suggest the one needing treatment Is you...

You can't really be this stupid.

If that's your best response, it shows you really are "this stupid."

We're done here, Salty. I've had enough of dim men of low character like you for the rest of the year.

Good night.

If that's your best response, it shows you really are "this stupid."

We're done here, Salty. I've had enough of dim men of low character like you for the rest of the year.

Good night.

You didn't thank me for explaining the joke to you.

That's just rude.

See you next year, and happy holidays to your couch- it might need reinforcement.

PS- this is not a joke about your wife.

If the earlier joke needed an explanation-
I can only imagine the years it will take to explain your last post to him.

Rarely does one find a specimen with such a fragile, yet monstrous, ego with an absolute genius for alienating people, all the while convincing itself of its infallibility.

Truer words etc.