trowell1817 wrote:Thanks Brent - great choice. Man, I debated the Dodgers A LOT yesterday but ultimately landed up the coast. Just a quick reminder and question to all because this thought came up in my head as I weighed the Dodgers. Based on the rules outlined, Mike Piazza is a Met by definition, so based on the rules already outlined if no one picks the Mets as a franchise, then this soon-to-be HOF'er is a free agent. That being said, what if Brent took him as a supplementary draft pick (not a bad play in my estimation). This is not spelled out in the rules, but I would vote for allowing his Dodger cards to be available to Brent. Thoughts?
On a similar note, for players that are FA's - do we allow any of their cards to be used? Again, I didn't spell this out in the rules so I think we need to confirm this now. Again, my vote is "yes" on this count but happy to entertain any opposing views!
trowell1817 wrote:Treyomo - good question, but no - I would prefer to keep the player as they were with their franchise. Hopefully this doesn't mess up your strategy too much!
Correct me if I'm wrong, Mr. Commish, but the distinction you seem to be making is that we can use one of our draft picks to draft someone carded to our team, but who is a free agent, because of greater AB or IP with another team that was not selected. For example, the Reds (or any team for that matter) can draft Dave Parker as a free agent, since the Pirates, who own his rights, were not selected.
I have a question also. If a player whose rights a team initially owns is not on the team's roster after the autodraft, does the owner lose rights to that player, or does he retain rights to all of his players for the duration of the league? For example, if the A's don't draft Mark McGwire in the autodraft, do the A's still retain his rights, to use whenever they please, throughout the league, does he become a free agent or does he become available only to the Cardinals, who have his non-A's cards?
Please let us know. - Bernie