Page 1 of 1

SP vs SP*

PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:56 am
by djskcsams
What is the SP* rating based on? There are SP* withn only 133 IP and SP with 233 IP. If you compare Pedro Martinez` 2000 SP card (29 games, 217 IP) with Greg Maddux SP*card (28 games and 209 IP) it does not make sense. Is this another riddle of HAL? Any feedback?

Re: SP vs SP*

PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:12 am
by rjohaire
It's suppose to be based on reallity
In the olden days, before 1970, most pitchers started on 3 days rest. The one with non * are usually relievers that filled in,
Of course, current day most pitchers need 4 days rest.

This game would be enhanced, if HAL paid attention to usage.

Re: SP vs SP*

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:17 pm
by Valen
Who is the pitcher with only 133 innings and an * rating.

in general to get * rating you need 33+ starts and/or 200 innings. The idea is not that the pitcher did in fact start every 4th game but if he had say 34 starts he could have been used in a 4 man rotation. At least it is not that much of a stretch to allow that strategy if a manager so chooses. But if a guy only pitched 100 innings then it would be a stretch to think that pitcher could have been an every 4th game starter.

Re: SP vs SP*

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 6:56 pm
by djskcsams
Bob Feller 1954 had only 140 IP and is SP*

Re: SP vs SP*

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:22 pm
by rjohaire
he must of gotten hurt - started 19 games and used in only 19 games
in 55 and 56 he was used mostly as a reliever and then his career was over.
pitcher injuries aren't really reflected very well - so would guess for his 19 games he was a 3 day rest guy.
It would help this game if they considered usuage in how the players were used.