Page 1 of 1
more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Sun May 12, 2013 12:47 am
by danielz
Down by 4 in the 9th
1st 2 men reach
Pesky flys out to right
Dumb Hal decides that runner on 2nd should tag up and try to advance to 3rd
He's out of course.
Hal is a dope.
Re: more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Sun May 12, 2013 9:15 am
by labratory
I've seen that more times than I would like. Sometimes it works for you and sometimes against. Still, it would be good for HAL to understand that in the 9th inning, there is a huge difference between the potential tying runner and the runner who could get you within two runs.
Re: more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Sun May 12, 2013 9:29 am
by visick
Who is the RF?
Re: more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Sun May 12, 2013 11:51 am
by Valen
And what is your team running setting?
Re: more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Sun May 12, 2013 4:12 pm
by danielz
Nellie Fox was the runner on 2nd
George Selkirk was in RF
Base running set at normal
Even if safe chance was 1-19, I don't want him going in that situation.
If he was the tying run, that would be different.
Re: more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Sun May 12, 2013 11:14 pm
by Valen
But virtually any baseball player if he had 95% odds of being safe would go. Most would go with lesser odds.
I would say if you are not wanting to challenge in such situations your philosophy is very conservative with respect to baserunning and you should set your settings accordingly.
Re: more dumb Hal baseball
Posted:
Mon May 13, 2013 1:14 am
by danielz
Valen wrote: Most would go with lesser odds.
Not down by 4 runs.
Every manager in baseball would go up to that player and say, "What the heck are you doing"?