Strat-O-Matic Baseball 365

Ok, let's just call it a hypothetical ... Let's say every time you wind up in the playoffs against a certain manager you lose. Let's say it's happened a dozen times. Let's say you've been up 3 games to 1 against the same manager three times in a row and you lose each series. Let's say you're suspicious and you go back and see that you were up 3-0 against the same guy a few months ago and lost. Then you check leagues where you've been in the same division, and you find two or three instances where you were up on the guy like 3, 4, or 5 games with less than 10 to play and you end up losing every race. What would you think ?? Comments.

RickRanger wrote:Ok, let's just call it a hypothetical ... Let's say every time you wind up in the playoffs against a certain manager you lose. Let's say it's happened a dozen times. Let's say you've been up 3 games to 1 against the same manager three times in a row and you lose each series. Let's say you're suspicious and you go back and see that you were up 3-0 against the same guy a few months ago and lost. Then you check leagues where you've been in the same division, and you find two or three instances where you were up on the guy like 3, 4, or 5 games with less than 10 to play and you end up losing every race. What would you think ?? Comments.

I think you should name names.

I think if a person could hack the game then they wouldn't be behind to start with

i do not think we should be pointing fingers and "naming names" based off of baseless accusations.

I would not get in a league with that guy anymore

You call this serious allegation a "hypothetical." That's not the way you should handle it. If you think the game has been hacked, you should notify onlinegamessupport of your suspicion, providing all pertinent details, and let the systems experts there check it out. Going public with hypotheticals isn't worth a warm bucket of spit.

I agree with steven and bontomn. Unless you have the "proof" to backup your claim, there is no way that you should name anyone.

For a younger person who is ...say...a computer expert....it'd probably be a breeze.

Going public with hypotheticals isn't worth a warm bucket of spit.

What if the spit were tossed in the freezer to get it cold?

But for those who wish to have names named here is my list of most likely suspects.... Drum roll please ....
There is no question Harold Finch could do that. Or maybe root. Shadowwalker could definitely pull it off. Alec Hardison could do it if Nate asked him to. But they have more important things to do.

Seriously no way you make a public accusation without proof. This is not the NBA. I would take bontomn's advice.

But as long as I am being serious I think several are failing to see the humor in RickRangers's initial post.

http://onlinegames.strat-o-matic.com/team/view/1023917

funny you mention this thread

swept the first series 31-13

won game 1, 8-4
Lost game 2, gave up 2 in bottom of 8th, 1 on bottom of tenth, 6-5
won game 3, 5-3
won game 4, 6-1

by this point im already starting to plan my next two teams, and you guessed it:

game 5, leading 2-0, gave up a 5 spot top of 6, lost 5-2
game 6, scored 4 in top of 8th (yeah), gave up two in bottom of 9th, lost 6-4

and now game 7 tonight....funny, because this almost exact same pattern has happen to me in the playoffs three different times this year (3 dif sets too). I will look for them and post if i can find them. i do not remember if the managers were all the same, but man the results in these playoff games resemble nothing like i have ever seen before.

and i been doing the puter version since 1996, online version since, man i cant even remember


OH YEAH, HAVE TO ADD THIS, MY "CLOSER" IS SORIANO, ONLY 2.2 INNINGS THIS POST SEASON, 3 SAVES, NO HITS OR WALKS.....COME ON HAL, USE THE DAMN GUY, THE TEAM SETTING IS SET TO FREAKING REGULAR, NOT MAXIMIZE!!!!!