Page 1 of 1
Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:47 amby george barnard
Not wanting to take away needed Reliever only guys from the pre-war set, but really, shouldn't Wilcy Moore's 1927 card be S/R given that he started 12 of the 50 games he appeared in, pitching 6 complete games (meaning that at least 50 of his 213 innings are from his complete games alone -- 93 of his innings come from starts, some 44%)?
Bill
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Tue Jan 19, 2016 3:55 amby LoopsandRolls
shhhhhhhh!
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Tue Jan 19, 2016 7:22 amby drfreeze49
The original Wilcy did have a starting rating in ATG....then...one ver. (not sure which) he the starting rating vanished
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:11 amby scorehouse
years ago the 1927 Yanks were one of the first oldtimer teams introduced in the board game. Wilcy was the best sp card n the team
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Tue Jan 19, 2016 5:05 pmby Radagast Brown
It seems like you have found a mistake that needs correcting.
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:15 amby MIKEGILBERT
When Strat added the rule requiring 3 RP-only pitchers to "prevent" super-relievers, they dropped the "S" rating on a number of old-timer cards to increase the pool of R-only cards in the set.
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:14 pmby geekor
MIKEGILBERT wrote:When Strat added the rule requiring 3 RP-only pitchers to "prevent" super-relievers, they dropped the "S" rating on a number of old-timer cards to increase the pool of R-only cards in the set.
That wasn't to prevent super-relievers, it was to prevent the "no-relief, every SP goes 9+ inning" method.
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:29 pmby MIKEGILBERT
They say memory is the first thing to go . . . .
Re: Wilcy Moore
Posted:
Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:11 amby george barnard
MIKEGILBERT wrote:They say memory is the first thing to go . . . .
And a good thing, too...that way I don't have to remember what the second thing to go is...
Bill