- Posts: 810
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:32 pm
After tomorrow night's 3 game series...I'll, for the first time in the past 15 years...have Zero active teams...Whether winning or losing, this game has been beyond my understanding...just when I think I know something...I don't. lol
Like I was pretty sure a 10m Sp (actually 9.80) C.Mathewson *could* go 12-18 with an ERA of 6.49 while giving up 76 Hrs in 290 innings, because it's a 140m cap and hitter friendly... BUT how in the world does a 4.17 Sp on that same team go 8-1 with only a 4.05 Era in 20 starts.
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1418365
Or like how can 14.5 Barry Bonds hit 62 Hrs for my squad...and 2.45 D. Johnson hit 57 for that same team.
See win or lose...good for my team or bad for my team...results that should happen once in a blue...happen far more frequently...making the game, for me, unknowable...I mean what can *I know* if at the beginning of any given year I'm not sure if my team will win 95 games...or lose 88...And I guess since my better teams win 95 and my lesser teams *only* lose 88 that accounts for my above .500 lifetime winning pct...but really it speaks to how little I understand the game...or how the game is just tons of luck and black box.
I remember w-a-y back in ATG1 Treyomo was talking about an often used cheaper SP Kid Speer...he said he could make or break your team depending on whether you got the 4.01 ERA Speer or the 8.97 ERA Speer...Flip a coin.
Customer service answers my questions at about a 1 out of 3 ratio (I don't write to them often) because my belief is, when they don't have a sensible answer...they just don't answer...like why is my SP left in, in the bottom of the 9th with 4-0 lead all the way down to F2 when my rested closer just sits and watches...causing me to lose the division by that game.
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/game/playbyplay/428754/960
And I guess Familiarity does breed contempt or maybe frustration because no matter how big the player pool gets (what are we up to now 5500) there's not much originality...(that's why I have so much admiration for example Whoopycat's team that won a title using low error players..very very cool.)
So for those reasons, I'm out.
Like I was pretty sure a 10m Sp (actually 9.80) C.Mathewson *could* go 12-18 with an ERA of 6.49 while giving up 76 Hrs in 290 innings, because it's a 140m cap and hitter friendly... BUT how in the world does a 4.17 Sp on that same team go 8-1 with only a 4.05 Era in 20 starts.
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1418365
Or like how can 14.5 Barry Bonds hit 62 Hrs for my squad...and 2.45 D. Johnson hit 57 for that same team.
See win or lose...good for my team or bad for my team...results that should happen once in a blue...happen far more frequently...making the game, for me, unknowable...I mean what can *I know* if at the beginning of any given year I'm not sure if my team will win 95 games...or lose 88...And I guess since my better teams win 95 and my lesser teams *only* lose 88 that accounts for my above .500 lifetime winning pct...but really it speaks to how little I understand the game...or how the game is just tons of luck and black box.
I remember w-a-y back in ATG1 Treyomo was talking about an often used cheaper SP Kid Speer...he said he could make or break your team depending on whether you got the 4.01 ERA Speer or the 8.97 ERA Speer...Flip a coin.
Customer service answers my questions at about a 1 out of 3 ratio (I don't write to them often) because my belief is, when they don't have a sensible answer...they just don't answer...like why is my SP left in, in the bottom of the 9th with 4-0 lead all the way down to F2 when my rested closer just sits and watches...causing me to lose the division by that game.
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/game/playbyplay/428754/960
And I guess Familiarity does breed contempt or maybe frustration because no matter how big the player pool gets (what are we up to now 5500) there's not much originality...(that's why I have so much admiration for example Whoopycat's team that won a title using low error players..very very cool.)
So for those reasons, I'm out.