Chompsky wrote: We can't undo the racist legacy of baseball but this simulation helps us imagine a better baseball world.
True, and while thankful for the NEL, it is too bad it didn't happen earlier, and a NEL should never have been needed in the first place of course, by our sensibilities. Lots of talent that should have been rewarded, and more people of all types should have been able to enjoy.
But I think it's important to note everything in context. Baseball's "racist legacy" was well ahead of society at large. One that led the way in its time for doing the right thing when the right thing was not popular. Between 1940-59, that legacy was one that was well ahead of what was in the streets of Philadelphia or Mobile or LA. Well before even Ike's 1950s push for a Civil Rights Act or calling in the troops to force integration.
After all, in our hubris, what do we choose today that is the unpopular right thing? When Lincoln chose to fight a civil war, the abolitionist party had only a couple percentage points of polling support. Wasn't easy to do the right thing. He wasn't following mobs--he was leading the way to actually honor the principles of the Declaration. The Reconstruction Amendments that followed in the 1860s were resisted by the SCOTUS and followed a terrible trail of cases that should never have been necessary after winning a Civil War to settle such things.
When Woodrow Wilson forced re-segregation of the previously integrated federal workforce much to WEB Dubois's chagrin, when FDR appointed a known and active KKK leader to the SCOTUS, and Sen Robert Byrd held one of the highest positions in the KKK in the last part of the 20th century, these folks were not following Lincoln's, Ike's, Jackie Robinson's or Branch Rickey's example.
So, I think context is needed and I for one am thankful, that in its time, baseball succeeded in leading the way to do the right thing, when it was not the poll-tested answer.
Cheers and Happy 100th for sure, but wishing there never even had to be a NEL,
Frank