Page 1 of 1

A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2020 11:29 pm
by tkl33
https://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1580824

Bonds is sick...

To me though, if this can happen and noone cares, then there isn't any reason not to have super relievers. Both are unrealistic, so no difference in my book.

Tim

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:11 am
by teamsters805
Congratulations....... The uncanny statistical accuracy of
this game is unreal.

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 11:29 pm
by Morpheus
If Barry only played at Coors Field :D
https://www.mlb.com/news/the-season-bar ... -95-homers
Or had Mays, McCovey and Ott around him in the lineup.

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2020 11:55 pm
by STEVE F
Awesome! And I agree with you
Can you post a link to the league's final standings please?

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 5:43 pm
by Chompsky
Good job, Tim! That is an accomplishment I never achieved. Well done! I think it is pretty cool, and a reflection of good player choice(s) to exploit the advantages of a given home park.

I enjoyed Sutter and super-relievers as much as anyone, but the change there was more pressing than anything to do with what a power hitter can do in a power park.

Back of the (bio-degradable, of course) napkin math:

Max HRs in MLB (61-75) Max in Strat 114
Max RBIs in MLB (190 or so I think) max in Strat 282

That's not too bad, as compared to the relief disparity.

Mike Marshall I think has the innings record for a reliever at 208. Some us were able to over double that number, and creep over 450. In the modern game, relievers don't even hit the 100 inning mark, so folks were generating reliever numbers of maybe 5x the current maximum. Whereas in baseball on any given year someone hits 50-55 home runs, so Bonds-in-Strat hitting 110 is about only about 2x that.

I could be looking at this wrong. Others are welcome to weigh in.

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2020 7:43 pm
by STEVENSTEFFANNI
noticed it didnt hurt the roll went for Bonds 29 times more than the pitcher...Im new at this but I have a team that after 81 gms is -125 my hitters to pitchers.Im seeing to win you need the dice to roll in your favor {obviously]

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 5:02 pm
by tkl33

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2020 7:14 pm
by Hack Wilson
I sniff at that. How about Jeff Bagwell with 123 homers and 270 RBIs?

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1547632

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 4:19 pm
by ploughboy1526
teamsters805 wrote:Congratulations....... The uncanny statistical accuracy of
this game is unreal.


:lol:

Has anyone played a full 2001 season with that 2001 Bonds card? If he does that against HOF pitchers, what the hell would he do with the 2001 NL starters?

150 HRs, 300 RBI and an OPS of at least 1.800?

Re: A first for me..100HR 200RBI

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2020 4:21 pm
by ploughboy1526
Hack Wilson wrote:I sniff at that. How about Jeff Bagwell with 123 homers and 270 RBIs?

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1547632


Maybe a beach ball and wiffle bats would help.