Strat-O-Matic Baseball 365

and after losing in the 9th another game 7 Finals, I've won one fucking title...Can anyone top that level of ineptitude or bad luck?

Sorry for the vent but I'm beyond frustrated.


nev

I went on a 0-16 streak early in 9, despite making the playoffs in 14 of those 16 seasons. But then I won 8 rings in the next 12 teams, so it kind of evens out.

The Last Druid wrote:I went on a 0-16 streak early in 9, despite making the playoffs in 14 of those 16 seasons. But then I won 8 rings in the next 12 teams, so it kind of evens out.

Let me know when to expect that "evening out".

My ATG9 winning % is .535 but my ATG 9 playoff winning % is .465.

As for Nev's streak, he's right, as bad as mine has been, I can't top that.

Someone must be winning playoff series but not me. 11 teams 7 playoffs 0-7. .546 regular season .452 playoffs couple of up 3-1 collapses. And sprinkle in 3 teams that missed out on playoffs due to tie breakers

Hittmens wrote:Someone must be winning playoff series but not me. 11 teams 7 playoffs 0-7. .546 regular season .452 playoffs couple of up 3-1 collapses. And sprinkle in 3 teams that missed out on playoffs due to tie breakers

Unfortunately, it hasn't been me. Playing at a .545 clip in the regular season; tumbling to .469 in the playoffs.

All the more reason that "bonus points" for titles is absurd.

I dont do that well in the play-offs and I wonder if that has anything to do with team design? I wonder if someone who does has a theory? I would note that Nevdully's overall play-off record (.525) appears to be in line with his regular season (.539). That doesnt make dealing with such a bad streak any easier, of course. Three of my first nine teams this year were 100 win teams and those three teams won 1 play-off series combined. Expectations were not met...

I don’t think I is design I think it is Match ups. Sometimes you have a 100 win team from a weak division and play a wild card team from a strong division that you don’t match up well against

ScumbyJr wrote:All the more reason that "bonus points" for titles is absurd.

exactly what I was going to add

ScumbyJr wrote:All the more reason that "bonus points" for titles is absurd.

Why have a title even then? Why not just most wins and leave it at that? If winning playoffs is luck and absurd then why would the ultimate winner and prize winner in a league be rewarded for pure luck?