Skeptical about the value of defensive subs
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2024 8:30 pm
Not sure defensive subs are worth their weight in supposed "gold." Seems like they get too many at bats and very few X chances, just anecdotally noticing. After 144 games for one team of mine -- I'd rather my at bats go to Ralph Kiner (9.65M, 4 +1 e7) at LF than Dick Whitman (.59M, 2 e7), his defensive sub. So, 22 at bats for Whitman, only "4" X chances to help on defense. https://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1786820
Seems like always better to have the big hitter for that one last big bop when so few defensive chances go to defensive subs and they can't hit at all. In the above, let's say roll of the dice give 11/11 outcomes (for Whitman's total 22 at bats) on either pitcher or hitter card -- would certainly want those on Kiner than Whitman, even if that sounds like a low number. Sometimes teams come from behind after def subs are inserted. I do rarely use defensive subs anyways, usually only at catcher for the throwing arm, seems to matter.
I have another example to post later too...
Seems like always better to have the big hitter for that one last big bop when so few defensive chances go to defensive subs and they can't hit at all. In the above, let's say roll of the dice give 11/11 outcomes (for Whitman's total 22 at bats) on either pitcher or hitter card -- would certainly want those on Kiner than Whitman, even if that sounds like a low number. Sometimes teams come from behind after def subs are inserted. I do rarely use defensive subs anyways, usually only at catcher for the throwing arm, seems to matter.
I have another example to post later too...