Mon Oct 29, 2012 12:45 pm
I would have to dust off some of the books from statistic classes that I took in school in order to get an exact figure, but even though the numerical difference appears to be significant, in reality the percentage of the higher number (809) amounts to 54% of the total rolls (1,498). In my opinion, that seems to be within reason for a random distribution. Or another way of looking at it is that if everything was exactly even, there would have been 749 rolls on each card. Dividing 809 by 749 results in 1.08, or that the results on one card is occurring 8% more than the other card.