USKL 2 Chat/Trades

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Palmtana

  • Posts: 6941
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 7:47 pm
  • Location: SoCal

Re: USKL 2

PostSun Oct 28, 2012 11:44 am

For now, vote yes or no to the above question - a Yes vote is in favor of allowing the one-time courtesy to new owners

1. Palmtana - Yes
2. Qksilver
3. TimK
4. BlueIguana
5. Champ - no
6. Nythawk
7. Cubit
8. AFDickie
9. Ninersphan Yes
10. Jack
11. MFL
12. Smitty


This is standard fare in most leagues, right?
Offline

timklucinec

  • Posts: 4847
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:32 pm

Re: USKL 2

PostMon Oct 29, 2012 1:43 am

Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:47 pm
Re: USKL 2
Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:44 am

For now, vote yes or no to the above question - a Yes vote is in favor of allowing the one-time courtesy to new owners

1. Palmtana - Yes
2. Qksilver
3. TimK - yes
4. BlueIguana
5. Champ - no
6. Nythawk
7. Cubit
8. AFDickie
9. Ninersphan Yes
10. Jack
11. MFL
12. Smitty


This is standard fare in most leagues, right?
Offline

MFL536

  • Posts: 3402
  • Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:49 am

Re: USKL 2

PostWed Oct 31, 2012 1:23 pm

Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:47 pm
Re: USKL 2
Sun Oct 28, 2012 10:44 am

For now, vote yes or no to the above question - a Yes vote is in favor of allowing the one-time courtesy to new owners

1. Palmtana - Yes
2. Qksilver
3. TimK - yes
4. BlueIguana
5. Champ - no
6. Nythawk
7. Cubit
8. AFDickie
9. Ninersphan Yes
10. Jack
11. MFL Yes
12. Smitty


This is standard fare in most leagues, right?
Offline

nythawk129921

  • Posts: 3853
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:22 pm

Re: USKL 2

PostWed Oct 31, 2012 3:23 pm

For now, vote yes or no to the above question - a Yes vote is in favor of allowing the one-time courtesy to new owners

1. Palmtana - Yes
2. Qksilver
3. TimK - yes
4. BlueIguana
5. Champ - no
6. Nythawk - yes
7. Cubit
8. AFDickie
9. Ninersphan Yes
10. Jack
11. MFL Yes
12. Smitty
Offline

Jack377

  • Posts: 302
  • Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:54 am

Re: USKL 2

PostMon Nov 05, 2012 4:03 pm

For now, vote yes or no to the above question - a Yes vote is in favor of allowing the one-time courtesy to new owners

1. Palmtana - Yes
2. Qksilver
3. TimK - yes
4. BlueIguana
5. Champ - no
6. Nythawk - yes
7. Cubit
8. AFDickie
9. Ninersphan Yes
10. Jack Yes
11. MFL Yes
12. Smitty
Offline

blueiguana

  • Posts: 106
  • Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 9:52 am

Re: USKL 2

PostMon Nov 05, 2012 4:15 pm

Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 9:54 am



Re: USKL 2




Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:03 pm

For now, vote yes or no to the above question - a Yes vote is in favor of allowing the one-time courtesy to new owners

1. Palmtana - Yes
2. Qksilver
3. TimK - yes
4. BlueIguana - yes
5. Champ - no
6. Nythawk - yes
7. Cubit
8. AFDickie
9. Ninersphan Yes
10. Jack Yes
11. MFL Yes
12. Smitty
Offline

qksilver69

  • Posts: 1392
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:35 pm

Re: USKL 2

PostTue Nov 06, 2012 10:06 am

That's a majority already, no need for me to vote...
Offline

blsmith7

  • Posts: 3042
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:01 pm

Re: USKL 2

PostTue Nov 06, 2012 4:13 pm

Qk is correct, we have a majority, so the proposed rule carries. I will stipulate that, since are only season this year is underway, that the two new owners this season, and any subsequent new owners, will be permitted a "one time only" choice of available ballparks. The only way to then change BPs is to trade.

We still need to further explore any future rule considerations dealing with ballparks, such as a five year lease rule, or some other consideration. This is an area to explore in the offseason, then make any rule changes agreed upon by the majority.
Offline

blsmith7

  • Posts: 3042
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:01 pm

Re: USKL 2

PostFri Dec 21, 2012 11:56 pm

Just bumping this up to wish you all a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

And good luck to MFL and Blue in Game 7 of the semi-finals tonight to determine who will face Qk in the Finals.
Offline

blsmith7

  • Posts: 3042
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:01 pm

Re: USKL 2

PostThu Jan 24, 2013 12:13 am

Hey all - just bumping again for the first post of the new year.

Congrats go out to Qksilver for winning his first USKL II title over MFL. Nice job Dave!

I am also looking to stir up some conversation about the roster rules. The rules state that cuts will be made in February, and the FA draft will be conducted in March. They also stipulate this:

"3. The annual spring Free Agent draft is 15 rounds and is normally done on the live draft website. All managers need to drop enough players so that their pre-draft roster is 25."

I wasn't around for the beginning of this league, so I'm not sure why the rosters were required to cut to 25, but I personally am not in favor of it. I would prefer giving owners the option of keeping up to 30 players, which would also make the draft more manageable. So, my proposal would state the the annual FA draft would be from 10 - 15 rounds and managers would need to drop enough players so that their pre-draft roster is anywhere from 25 - 30. I am going to post the draft order below. Please reply as to whether you are in favor of this proposal. A yes vote would be in favor the roster rules amendment.

1. TimK
2. Ninersphan
3. Cubit
4. Palmtana
5. Smitty
6. Jack
7. Nythawk
8. theChamp87
9. BlueIguana
10. AFDickie
11. MFL536
12. Qksilver

Of course, I am assuming you are all returning, so please let me know if that is not the case.

Smitty
PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: stevea47 and 21 guests