BDWard wrote:Is stupid logic an oxymoron or am I just a stupid moron?
My teams went 8-7 tonight. There is a lot of room for movement either way if the games are replayed. But the outcome of the games is irrelevant in making the decision to replay.
The game engine malfunctioned. When that happens, the right thing to do is to replay the games. I want the lineups I made playing the games and my opponents are entitled to the same thing.
I don't think that there is any ambiguity here and apparently SOM agrees, otherwise why investigate the possibility of replaying the games? It will come down to whether such is feasible.
By the way, use of the phrase "going forward" instead of "in the future" or other such phrase has Bernie's signature all over it.
I hope I don't wake up in the morning and see revised results of 0-15, but if that's the price of getting it right, so be it.
To all those flailing around, this one hit it square on the head.
Yes the games had to be re-run--the first batch was not a valid run. Why someone thinks they "deserved" the results when the lineups were jacked up is beyond me. It wasn't just the order, it was who actually played--HAL picked the players from the roster. It was like leaving the lineups bank.
Like others, I've done that before--I think in most cases differences are negligible, but not in all cases. And besides, we paid to make inputs which weren't considered. Replay. Quick decision. Done. Good job by SOM for checking their work and being decisive.