Sat Apr 13, 2013 1:17 pm
the arm rating, as I have always understood it, is a composite of strength and accuracy, realized, if I can put it that way, as the increased (or decreased) probability that a throw by that outfielder will throw a runner out.
in that sense, it combines accuracy and stength (I would say velocity).
hard to see what the point of separate accuracy and velocity ratings would be, since the possibility of an error is already packed into the 'e' rating, although, I suppose there could be separate e ratings for fielding and throwing errors, as there are for catchers.
another thing I might mention based on the wording of one of the previous comments is that, to the extent that the card images and the computer representation represent the same probabilities, a hit followed by an '*' advances the runners as many bases as there are '*'s. in addition, WHEN a SINGLE or DOUBLE has neither '*'s nor an OF position, any throw is made by the CF.
I also thought that there was an adjustment for which base the throw went to matrixed by where it is made from - meaning there si a deduction from safe chances at third for throws from LF that does NOT apply to throws from RF. SO that Stargell in LF is, in a way, overkill, while a -6 Clemented in rf is an asset.