Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:16 pm
His usefullness was not the question... He is good. We do know that.
The question is...
IF, ya draft Moss 1st, miss him, and other managers list Encarnacion and Fielder on the draft card...
Is getting big Papi worth the risk of not getting one of those three. 1b is a fairly deep position, whereas say, CF or SS, not-so-much.
The question really is, do you gamble on say a 1-10 chance of getting Moss. Or do you draft a position that is considered thin first, with almost a basic gaurentee you will get that player?
IMO if you are building a team for a pitcher park, yes, take the chance, but if your drafting a team for a hitter park, why gamble, draft someone else who you are most assurdely going to get that player.
In a hitter park, there are MANY 1b that can get close to Moss-like numbers for half his cost, easily.
Now, if your drafting Moss for LF, that can change things too, as there are less than a dozen top notch LFers in the set over 5 mill.
On a differnet, but again, IMO, related subject...
There are some serious pricing flaws in the 1.5 to 5 million range in this set for hitters, hopefully, next year, the powers that be get the science of pricing a lil closer as to how these cards perform in our online version of the game.
For pitchers, the starters the powers that be, got it pretty close to what the pricing should be. Yes, there are some misses, but its a lot better than hitters...
Now, for the RPers in this years set... THAT, is another story.
outside of the Chapmans, Rodneys, and such of the set... why would anyone draft a RPer over 4 million with this years cards? There are SOOO many very good, very cheap RPers in this set that it almost skews the game.
Dont get me wrong, I totally love pitching, so am in heaven with the pricing for the pitchers. And am still totally stoked that SOM rolled this out a week earlier than what we are use to... Just next year, maybe SOM should get someone involved in the pricing of the RPers, that knows how to use the bullpen settings.
Just Saying