Tue Sep 10, 2013 10:12 pm
{I apologize to the forum for editing this post five times...The English teacher in me sometimes wins out. Instead of adding a second post, I decided to meld my final thoughts on the matter with this post, and I wanted this one to be particularly clear, polite, and fair)
F33dM3,
I did not respond to your first post, since it only made personal attacks without addressing my actual arguments.
However, I will respond to your second post, in which you partially addressed my arguments in my post to Valen.
In your initial post, which I post above, you made the following complaint:
"the #3 pick had FOUR of the guys high on my list! how can he get 4 of my top 5 picks and I get NONE!?"
It was implied in this complaint that you were unhappy with missing out on your first four picks in the draft and that a player possibly missing out on his first four picks in the draft was one of the problems you have with the current draft system. Others writing after you actually made that complaint, hoping a new system could at least guarantee everyone got "some top picks." As i pointed out to Valen--yes, I did address his argument in my post--this problem could be even worse in a live draft system, where a player could miss out on his first 5-11 picks. Therefore, if a new drafting system was to fix the problem you implied above (and others actually bemoaned), it would have to do better than providing an autodraft system similar to a live draft...as I pointed out to Valen.
You now, judging from your post above this one, are and were apparently fine with missing your first 5-11 preferred players, However, other players unhappy with the current system would not necessarily be so. They expressed a distinct hope that a new system would make it more likely they got their second or third pick if they missed out on their first pick. For example, in one of his previous posts, Radagast complained about not getting his first two picks. And, in separate posts, Geekor expressed hope that in the new system "everyone would get some high picks" or that "everyone would at least get some of their top picks."
So, while you and others who have posted on this forum all dislike the current system and want a new one, you still need to decide amongst yourselves what you want the new drafting system to actually do. Do you want the system to insure that "everyone would get some high picks,"--as Geekor (and I imagine others) wants--or do you want the system to just be more equitable and not care about such insurance, as you said you didn't care about it in your post above this one.
I sincerely hope you all figure it out in this forum or another. I like the current system, but I would welcome a new one that made most (if not all) of the players happy.
L. Strether
P.s. Thank you for the Richard Dawkins comparison. i consider it a true complement
Last edited by
l.strether on Wed Sep 11, 2013 3:33 am, edited 5 times in total.