I haven't seen one of these in a while...

The wrong end of a rare 8 IP no hitter.

This is in one of Andy's era leagues.

http://onlinegames.strat-o-matic.com/ga ... 347572/659

here is another no hitter but team loses. 4 walks in same inning.

http://onlinegames.strat-o-matic.com/game/347567/961

Wow, rough outing for Worthington. He gives up the walk, gets charged with the ER that lost the game and goes down with a 10 game injury.

Quick hook for Schilling after just 89 pitches. There should be a logic similar to what real ML managers do, stretching the pitchcount for a guy on a no-no - and then have that guy pitch from F6 fatigue for his next two outings.

My question would be - why walk Bud Harrelson (BUD HARRELSON!) to get to Eddie Stanky who practically walks half the time he bats? With two outs and runners on second and third - is it just to get the force out at second? Does HAL ever consider the next batter? I don't think it's worth it. Those intentional walk sequences just drive me nuts! In a game the other day - same situation - second and third, two outs, Eddie Mathews up! Holy Crap! HAL issues an intentional walk - don't want to let Eddie Mathews get a hit. Let's see who's up next........DOH! Mickey Mantle! Bingo bango bongo.......GRAND SLAM!
WTF?!

You have a point about whether Hal should consider who is up next. But most real life managers issue the intentional walk in situations where it sets up a double play regardless of who is up next. So I will cut Hal some slack on this one.

Possible double play wasn't in order in either of these situations. Second and third, TWO (2) outs.