joethejet wrote:Question for you guys.
What types of players do you think were over priced, or under priced in the last set?
I think range ratings at 1b and 3b are over-priced - good ones are priced too high, and bad ones depress prices too much, I think. Good range ratings at 1b and 3b seem to be under-priced. DH type players (like Ortiz) seem to be underpriced, while a player like Votto seems to be over-priced. Miguel Cabrera seems under-priced.
On discussion board threads, most veteran players seem to say that great range ratings at 2b and ss are a must. That implies that they are underpriced! Otherwise, if they were priced higher, players wouldn't swear by them as much as they seem to. I can't recall a single time that I got a great range at 2b or ss and regretted it. By contrast, I have regretted fielding a 3 at either 2b or ss on many occasions - more than I'd like to admit! So, for my money, Rollins looks like a "value" card in a home run park - especially one where lefties get high BP home run chances. Walker at 2b is nice for the same reasons ( witness the 'roids debate last season!). Both cards seem undervalued.
The Rollins/Walker thought brings to mind another point. Anytime you can get a nice R balanced player, they are sometimes under-priced, since you can get a similarly nice value player as the opposite balance for the platoon. MacDonald and Kinsler were good examples in 2012. Nice platoons like these get uber-value from the cards.
Pacheco, Pierre, and Hunter were great values in non-homerun parks. Pacheco's doubles were really nice for the $. Hunter was great hitting for average, and defines. Pierre was a terrific on base guy as a platoon. Gutierrez was an awesome platoon - the injury factor for a platoon vs. LHP seemed to deflate his salary too much.
Those are my thoughts on card values, and some favorites.