Tue Mar 25, 2014 9:58 pm
I think as they progressed into the manager ratings venture they found out they were in over their heads and it is not cost effective to compile manager ratings. They found out that many managers created multiple profiles to take advantage of the new customer rates. Do they attempt to (A) merge all profiles to who the real managers are, (B) create separate ratings for all of these "new" managers or (C) forget about the whole thing and hope we don't bug them about it. I think they picked option (C). They used to give us progress reports on the manager ratings but ceased mentioning it in the blogs. Even though the rating system was somewhat flawed, it takes advantage of the average baseball fans love of stats. Just watching your profile name climb the ratings page helped encourage managers to play more teams. It also helped in making friends as names became familiar. With SOM deciding to look the other way on managers creating multiple profiles, it has helped to maintain anonymity. Without being familiar with who your opponents are, less rivalries are formed, less games are played and less money spent at SOM.