removing players with the lead

Moderators: Palmtana, coyote303

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

rhonda1957

  • Posts: 209
  • Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:10 pm

removing players with the lead

PostFri Mar 28, 2014 10:58 pm

I would think an easy option of "remove player with the lead". (Blow Out). Nothing worse then losing a high injury player winning 12-0 in the 8th.
Offline

coyote303

  • Posts: 1531
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:01 pm
  • Location: Colorado

Re: removing players with the lead

PostSat Mar 29, 2014 10:45 am

+1
Offline

andycummings65

  • Posts: 14570
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: removing players with the lead

PostSat Mar 29, 2014 4:27 pm

I love the idea.

Blow out may need to be changed to a run limit, like "Remove after 7 innings if Run differential in 10 runs or greater" or something like that.

Blow Out is vague. Give it a number value.

Sometimes my "Mopup" reliever comes in with the score closer than I'd like, for example.
Offline

rhonda1957

  • Posts: 209
  • Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:10 pm

Re: removing players with the lead

PostSat Mar 29, 2014 6:29 pm

andycummings65 wrote:I love the idea.

Blow out may need to be changed to a run limit, like "Remove after 7 innings if Run differential in 10 runs or greater" or something like that.

Blow Out is vague. Give it a number value.

Sometimes my "Mopup" reliever comes in with the score closer than I'd like, for example.

7 runs after the 7th
Offline

geekor

  • Posts: 2726
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:32 pm

Re: removing players with the lead

PostThu Apr 10, 2014 10:50 am

Of course the title could also be that you want to shoot the baserunners with a lead bullet.... I mistook the title completely, stupid English language, be more standard!
Offline

paul8210

  • Posts: 438
  • Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:21 am

Re: removing players with the lead

PostMon Apr 14, 2014 11:17 am

If Manny Mota is constantly protected from being injured by being removed from games in which the lead is substantial due to his offensive contributions, the player will not achieve his expected games missed due to injury and this is in injustice to opposing managers.

If the proposed idea were implemented, then Smokey Burgess and players of his ilk would need to have their salaries adjusted upward.
Last edited by paul8210 on Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Offline

rhonda1957

  • Posts: 209
  • Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:10 pm

Re: removing players with the lead

PostMon Apr 14, 2014 11:22 am

paul8210 wrote:If Manny Mota is constantly protected from being injured by being removed from games in which the lead is substantial due to his offensive contributions, the player will not achieve his expected games missed due to injury and this is in injustice to opposing managers.

Mota was a pinch hitter back in those days pinch hitters couldn't get injured
Offline

STEVE F

  • Posts: 4253
  • Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:08 pm

Re: removing players with the lead

PostMon Apr 14, 2014 12:59 pm

paul8210 wrote:If Manny Mota is constantly protected from being injured by being removed from games in which the lead is substantial due to his offensive contributions, the player will not achieve his expected games missed due to injury and this is in injustice to opposing managers.

If the proposed idea were implemented, then Smokey Burgess and players of his ilk would need to have their salaries adjusted upward.

Perhaps, but if you were in a CDROM league, this is exactly how you would manage
Offline

Scottbdoug

  • Posts: 265
  • Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:25 am

Re: removing players with the lead

PostWed Apr 23, 2014 8:43 pm

Personally i would prefer a choice on using injuries at all. What i think would be better is the option of using at bat totals. If a player had 450 ABs for that season then thats how many ABs he is allowed to accumulate. With this option there is no need to use the injuries.
Offline

rhonda1957

  • Posts: 209
  • Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 8:10 pm

Re: removing players with the lead

PostWed Apr 23, 2014 8:49 pm

Scottbdoug wrote:Personally i would prefer a choice on using injuries at all. What i think would be better is the option of using at bat totals. If a player had 450 ABs for that season then thats how many ABs he is allowed to accumulate. With this option there is no need to use the injuries.

that would be interesting, you would have to manage their at bats. you could save all your wounded to have available for the end of the season.
Next

Return to Wish List, Suggestions for SOM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests