- Posts: 438
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:21 am
I understand the concept of homeruns being easier in some parks and easier for a particular type of hitter. But, does it make sense to say that a ballpark is singles friendly for one type of hitter? Is the left side of the infield artificial turf in DC Stadium and the right side grass? Of course not.
So, I'm guessing that ballpark singles (>) are just a mechanism for increasing the accuracy of simulating batting averages and E.R.A's and has little to do with a cause and effect relationship between the stadium infield and any other factor.
I'm also guessing clutch hitting symbols ($) are another way to gain additional statistical accuracy and has nothing to do with measuring whether a particular hitter is clutch.
In other words, if Cap Peterson is expected to hit .251 and plays half of his games in D.C. Stadium then clutch hitting and ballpark singles are just additional mechanisms for increasing the probability that Cap Peterson will bat .251 over a 162 game season against league foes and has nothing to do with measuring if he's clutch or if the left-hand side of the stadium infield is singles friendly.
They could have just as easily have had symbols measuring how Cap Peterson hits on Tuesdays and Thursdays as opposed to other days of the week and incorporated that into the player card with special symbols and it would accomplish the same objective. At least, that's my perception.
So, I'm guessing that ballpark singles (>) are just a mechanism for increasing the accuracy of simulating batting averages and E.R.A's and has little to do with a cause and effect relationship between the stadium infield and any other factor.
I'm also guessing clutch hitting symbols ($) are another way to gain additional statistical accuracy and has nothing to do with measuring whether a particular hitter is clutch.
In other words, if Cap Peterson is expected to hit .251 and plays half of his games in D.C. Stadium then clutch hitting and ballpark singles are just additional mechanisms for increasing the probability that Cap Peterson will bat .251 over a 162 game season against league foes and has nothing to do with measuring if he's clutch or if the left-hand side of the stadium infield is singles friendly.
They could have just as easily have had symbols measuring how Cap Peterson hits on Tuesdays and Thursdays as opposed to other days of the week and incorporated that into the player card with special symbols and it would accomplish the same objective. At least, that's my perception.