Scottbdoug wrote:The usual thing is that players who dont have the time have a 2nd manager to cover games. But there is nothing syopping strat from moving the cdrom and net play game fully to an online format. Thus bringing in everyone. Those who wish to stay with this version can do so.
Personally i prefer playing live againt another person but the netplay cdrom version of the game seems stuck in the late 90s in its concept. Get everyone online, play live if you wish, play with hal in this version too if you wish.
There are 1000s of players who play strat. Some can only play once a week some more. Like me it would be mostly on sundays. So i would join up with others who play on sundays. If its only a couple hours a week thats fine we just set up a 54 game schedule instead of 162 games or something of that sort.
If we can get everyone in the same place, the rest would be pretty simple. we just find the guys who have similar schedules as we do. And in emergencies hal can cover the few missed games.
Scott.
Yeah, I kind of figured a Sundays (or Saturdays) league would be the feasible way to go. Since most working players can't set aside any particular work night for so many consecutive weeks for a strat game, it would be difficult to get "everyone in the same place" for a mid-week schedule.
However, I'm not quite sure how Strat could make money providing a service that would be primarily used once a week over 54 or 162 weeks. They now charge 16 or 20 dollars for roughly 7.5-8.5 weeks of gameplay, not including drafting and waivers period, which comes out to about 2 dollars or 2.50 per week per player for a service with
regular participants. Would players be willing to pay out that much a week for Strat to facilitate their interleague play of one game a week, or would they demand a rate too low for Strat to make money? Strat would probably have to provide a subscription rate for this to work, but I'm still not sure if they could come up with one that would satisfy its subscribers while making its providing this more selective service profitable...particularly since some players already consider Strat's current rate too expensive.
As I said in my first post, I do think interleague Strat is a good idea, despite its inherent scheduling difficulties. So, I think if you and/or any other players seriously want it, you should probably come up with both a hypothetical way Strat could feasibly and effectively provide the service, as well as a reasonable rate a player would have to pay for that service. As one of those players, I'd be happy to join in once you started.