- Posts: 1502
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:24 am
- Location: Texas
motherscratcher wrote:I guess I'm in the minority that doesn't mind the addition of some Japanese and Cuban players. Seems like everyone else hates the idea.
I'm sure you're not the only one who likes the idea of non-major league cards, but you are correct, it is a minority viewpoint. The beauty of the opt in/opt out system is that everyone can have what they want and everyone can at least try the new cards to see if they like playing with them. Opt in/opt out is win-win for everybody, including SOM. It's virtually a no brainer.
While we're talking about the player set, customized player sets would seem to be the next step in the evolution of the game, moving forward from randomized player sets. We can already search by year range. How about a card set by year range, for instance 1970 to 1979? Or one could use any span of years. How about by team range, for example all Yankees? That would be especially good for smaller leagues. How about by league and or division(s) by year, like the AL West from 1972-1995? The possibilities are nearly endless and computer technology that's at least 10 years old can make this happen without major changes to the game platform.
SOM is fortunate to have a loyal and mostly patient fan base, but the average age, even in the online game, is probably 55+ and the base is shrinking. In order to continue to not only compete, but survive in the market, It must attract and keep younger fans in the face of ever increasing competition from computer games using the latest technology and with with great graphics, including realistic images of the players. If SOM fails to take advantage of the opportunity to update the game platform now, it will soon go the way of the telegraph, which was once on the leading edge of technology.
The game is at the crossroads and has been there for some time. Either it moves forward with input from it's loyal customer base or it disappears. ATG8 is a small step of a never ending journey in the right direction.
Many companies have disappeared because of a stubborn inability to change with the times and adapt to new technology. Just 30 years ago Kodak was an industry leader, but failed to adapt quickly enough and disappeared. Is Hal Richman part of the problem or part of the solution? Is there younger leadership waiting in the wings to move the company forward when it's time for Mr. Richman to pass the baton or will Mr. Richman be like Connie Mack or Al Davis and have others leave him behind? Yes, it happens in all industries, even sports and sports simulation games.
What's it going to be SOM?