rburgh wrote:I'm disappointed in the judgments posted her based on a few cards. Honestly, I think if a time traveler dropped into your house and gave you a jackpot winning ticket for your state lottery, most of you would bitch that it wasn't for the powerball.
Just how many $11 million cards not for players named Ruth or Bonds are left out there? Many of the requested cards were from George's list. But who do you think knows more about the collected SOM cards of the 17,000 people who have played MLB, George Barnard or Hal Richman?
Launch is scheduled for tomorrow - why don't you all look at more than 5 or 10 cards before posting your opinions? And please stop expecting them to find 50 new players that will impact $200 MM leagues - they probably just aren't there.
so a couple of things;
think G.B. or Bill as his folks like to call him, MAY not know as much about the cards but he did painstakingly compile the lists of what people wanted- which was an incredibly thankless task-
and why do all that if we aren't going from his lists of who are the most desired players?
I mean that as a serious question.
also, as i stated, am withholding my ultimate opinion until I see the cards- but for those Ive seen, am waiting to feel the excitement of it.
also also-
while I do welcome new cards- let me explain why imo that's not really going to be enough for more than a few months time.
There was a promise made that new cards would be added every month- that was back 3 years ago- so if I multiply 10 new cards X 36 months I get 360 new cards- just what we were told to expect; its just now they are being given all at once and given a title of ATG8.
So yes, there is a fair bit of negativity- some caused by yours truly- but there are also a number of reasons why people like myself who were seriously into this game for a number of years feel that way- and Im generally much more critical of myself than I am of outside forces- but I also tells it like I sees it.
...and finally- Appreciate RBurgh you coming on and giving us updates- otherwise we would have none.