- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:32 am
Actually the song you just posted, for me makes her case. While the song itself may be sappy and schmaltz, her range on it is INCREDIBLE. I have yet to hear anyone do justice to that song in trying to cover it. Any other version I've heard comes off a a piss poor imitation at best. Now I'm not necessarily saying she's a better female singer than the five you mentioned,( I'd take her over Nicks though) she certainly deserves to be in the discussion of a top 10 for female singers.
We completely agree that she has great range, although not as great as Franklin, Turner, Carey, Lennox, Beyonce and others. It's clear, though, you value range itself more than I do, while I more value singing style and interpretation. As I said before, that's fine. All music critics--including us amateurs on the forum--privilege different legitimate standards. So, where you revel in her range, I cringe at her Bolton-esque belting and over-sentimental interpretation. However, to give her credit, that awful song was over-sentimental from the get-go. But her range is impressive, she had a long career, and I have no problem with her in the discussion for top ten female singers.
As for Bono, he's in a category for me, like Geddy Lee or Dave Mathews, or Steve Perry or Stevie Nicks, great doing their stuff and able to cover other acts to a certain extent, and their respective bands' sounds would not be the same without their vocals, but could they move into another genre and be as good?
I see what you're saying here, Niners, although I would put Perry, Nicks, and Bono in a much higher plane than Lee or Matthews as singers. The only problem with this standard is it could disqualify many excellent singers from the Top Ten. How many genres could Sinatra, Jones, Orbison, Franklin, Lennon, Cline and other sing in? Not many. Although, I would certainly agree with you that singers who do sing successfully in different genres--like Morrison, Bowie, and Cash--add to their greatness as singers.
As Risden said, Bono is undoubtedly the best rock front man of the last 20 or so years, taking a mantle worn by, in no particular order, Plant, Jagger, Daltry, Mercury, but a top 10 singer? I just think he's not quite there, especially if you include male and female vocalist on the same list. He works at at though, there's no doubt about that and I respect the work he has put in to be better since the band started.
Well said. All four of those excellent Rock lead singers could preclude Bono from a Top Ten list, and I like and respect them all. As to Jagger, I always fluctuate on him. He clearly doesn't have the chops of the others, but he is such a stylish singer who so clearly understood how to interpret his own lyrics. I would be curious to hear what Jagger fans think. Anyway, Niners, thanks for your well-thought-out responses.