ATG 8 Poll #3

Really. Kershaw. As if the Dodgers NEED help with SPs!!! Plus the 2013 season is still playable. I know the 20XX are available to be played. The earlier versions say from 2001-2009 are rarely played and some of those seasons are not available.

Still lots of time for voting, but here's how it stacks up at the moment (Tuesday, March 24, 9:26am est, 747 votes). If the poll closed now, these guys would be in -

Kershaw - 48
Bouton - 40
Cummings - 32
Pedroia - 30
Abreu - 29
Beltre - 28
Ordonez - 28
Rolen - 28
Posey - 27
Sierra - 27
Glaus - 25
Barnes - 24
L. Gonzalez - 24
Reyes - 24
Zernial - 24
Molina - 23
Nelson - 22
Hoiles - 21
Seward - 21
Grabarkewitz - 19

Steve wrote:

Yep , these 1800's guys stats are so hard to take seriously I might as well make a card for myself and nominate it.

Boy do I second that emotion!~ Anything pre war I am really not interested in... I like some of the 1990s guys like Scott Rolen, Orlando Cabrera, and Bobby Abreu.

Steve wrote:

Anything pre war I am really not interested in...

Which war?

Maybe we could have an ATG 8 pre Civil War set of cards !

I recognize that Jeff Russell is lagging behind.......but please for those that haven't voted yet, CONSIDER THIS when you VOTE....one of the GREAT relief seasons pre-1990....would be a GREAT addition (guessing he'd have a salary in the high $4.50 to $4.99 range) a spot in great need of quality additions....i think he'd be a reliever used at all caps $100M to $200M unlike most of the players that have been added recently.

Just a thought-

but wouldn't it be wonderful if we could actually see the cards rather than just look up the stats when we were voting?

I mean those split numbers for example sure could turn a guy from a maybe to definitely, yeah?
or perhaps its a middle inf. who one might think is a 2 fielder but has a 3 rating, that sure would make a diff to me too.

Some great choices there, I voted for my five. On the flip side, I'd like to see more cheap but useful players available when filling out bench spots on a roster, and not just more stars added.

Some great choices there, I voted for my five. On the flip side, I'd like to see more cheap but useful players available when filling out bench spots on a roster, and not just more stars added.

I'm with you Jimbo, but I think the only way that's ever gonna happen is if Strat decided to drop in whole teams the way it all started

Just a thought-

but wouldn't it be wonderful if we could actually see the cards rather than just look up the stats when we were voting?

I mean those split numbers for example sure could turn a guy from a maybe to definitely, yeah?
or perhaps its a middle inf. who one might think is a 2 fielder but has a 3 rating, that sure would make a diff to me too.

Salty, that is an excellent suggestion!!!