- Code: Select all
(Among players over 2M, these are the worse buys accroding to my rating. Next to last colum is the difference, in absolute, between the value of the card and the pricetag, and the last column is a measure that can be interpreted as the relative difference---the hit you take on the overall 80M cap, by choosing this player)
Price Name Pos Run Value($) Diff Diff in%
Created (absolute) (relative)
8 210 000 Yelich,C 7 40,02 $6,60 -1,61 -1,96
4 460 000 Aybar,E 6 14,80 $3,58 -0,88 -1,98
8 230 000 Altuve, 4 41,13 $6,50 -1,73 -2,11
5 910 000 Santana,D 6 23,03 $4,56 -1,35 -2,28
6 130 000 Zobrist,B 4 24,41 $4,73 -1,40 -2,29
2 770 000 Stewart 2 4,56 $2,11 -0,66 -2,39
2 680 000 Gonzalez 4 1,98 $2,04 -0,64 -2,40
2 820 000 Blanco,A 6 2,43 $2,09 -0,73 -2,58
2 620 000 Gordon,D 4 0,87 $1,90 -0,72 -2,73
This is from my ratings, all positions pooled, for ballpark values set Great American at home and HR=10/10 on the road. As you see Dee Gordon is the worst buy in this category in relative terms, his value being equivalent to 1.90$ instead of 2.62$, but in real values, the worst buy is Altuve, value of 6.50$ instead of his pricetag 8.23M, for a net difference of 1.73M---in my ratings, for GreatAmerican, that's the worst of all the set.
I agree that Dozier will end up in the low .300, perhaps .330 in Great American. But 30 HR, stellar defense, isn't this what you look for a 8th/9th hitter?
Compared to Altuve 41 Runs Created, Dozier has 55.8 RC and Cano 49.3 RC in my ratings, all set for the stadium ratings set as above.