Help Please...How Does This Happen?

How does M. Wills in Forbes '57 hit a slammy on a 2-6 roll with pitcher at f9 and it reads Walk on Wills' card.


http://onlinegames.strat-o-matic.com/ga ... 426286/884

That has to be either a boxscore log typo or a card issue. I'd suggest others who have that Wills check to see which hitter combo generates HRs - wondering if the 2-5 and 2-6 are somehow transposed either in boxscore logs or on the card.

Yeah, a, a, a typo.. of course... ...no card error here...no black box stuff...nothing nefarious to see here leading to customer outrage...just a typo... yeah yeah that's the ticket.


Sincerely,
Tommy Flanaygan 4 th programmer.


Thanks T

another possibility, albeit just as much a problem, is that somehow for that roll it treated Arroyo as a righty, thus giving Wills a triple that he then stretched to a homer.

but.... I checked the other hitters who had rolls on their cards (McCosky and Chance) and their rolls both are correct off of a lefty...

thus, HAL would have had to read them against a lefty Arroyo and Wills as against a righty Arroyo. And that seems just as implausible.

nev, I think somebody just had it out for ya, my friend.

The '62 Wills card has a HR 1-5 chance on a 2-6 roll vs lefties... what am I missing here?

The '62 Wills card has a HR 1-5 chance on a 2-6 roll vs lefties... what am I missing here?

They finally fixed it! I've sent three emails pointing out the 2-6 walk that "becomes a HR" on 62 Wills, I just looked at the card and they finally changed it

Now I'm curious about the 83 Henderson who I've also tried to point out to them does NOT steal like a 20-16 should. I wonder if they fixed that card as well?

Anyone using 83 Henderson that is finally getting good SB numbers out of him?

The '62 Wills card has a HR 1-5 chance on a 2-6 roll vs lefties... what am I missing here?

They finally fixed it! I've sent three emails pointing out the 2-6 walk that "becomes a HR" on 62 Wills, I just looked at the card and they finally changed it

I emailed them a couple of days ago but no response yet.



Why did someone have to email them THREE times to correct a pretty important mistake, that should be pretty easy to fix?

They probably didn't want to ruin their stellar customer service reputation.

They probably didn't want to ruin their stellar customer service reputation.

<<Bah-dum-bump>> Thank you, I'm here every Friday, try the veal, don't forget to tip your waitstaff, good night Poughkeepsie!