Tue Jul 07, 2015 9:26 am
My experience is that some managers are nervous about making trade offers because they're afraid they'll be criticized if the manager on the other end doesn't appreciate the offer. I really like to talk trade, even if no deal comes of the negotiation, so I think it's important to create, as much as possible, a safe environment for the discussion of trades. This means, not criticizing either the person who makes the offer or the person who turns it down.
If I get an offer I don't like, I try to just politely refuse it rather than criticize the person who made the offer. I haven't lost anything by receiving a onesided offer and turning it down. In fact, when I've begun my polite refusal with a comment appreciating the offer, and a brief explanation of what I'm actually looking for, this has often led to a solid trade that helps both teams.
Similarly, if I make an offer and it's not accepted, I try to just say "Ok, no problem." I don't think it's a wise strategy to criticize the guy who turned it down. In fact, I think it might be a better idea to encourage the other owner to make a counter-offer of his own. The advantage of this approach is that it helps to keep lines of communicaiton open.
I agree with Nev that it's a good principal to offer only win-win trades. But what looks like win-win to the manager making the offer may look very one-sided to the manager receiving the offer. So...some patience is required on both sides.
Anyway, I try look a it this way--a one-sided offer from an opposing manager is the beginning of a conversation. I'm not going to make a trade that in my opinion hurts my team, but that first one-sided query from an opposing manager opens a dialogue that might lead to a good trade down the road.
And if occasionally another manager is unpleasant during a trade discussion despite my best efforts, I try to just shrug my shoulders and move on.
All of this said, while Edmonds would never be my top pick in CF, I've had pretty good luck with him in lefty parks in 140M and 200M leagues when I've missed my top pick and he's the only guy left--as he often is. Also, I guess I like Clark in a righty park a lot more than some other managers. He's a righty with high OBP and lots of homes who hits RHP better than LHP, and that has real value in my book. I'm not commenting on these specific trades or teams, but just saying that both Clark and Edmonds can have value in the right setting.
And it's this different evaluation of the same players by different managers is part of what makes trading players tricky but also very interestings.