- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:32 am
Ninersphan wrote:Merely pointing out where you seemingly, misread what I wrote and I wanted to be sure you didn't misread it this time.
People do do that without getting all worked up into vulgarity and all-caps, you know; It's called keeping your cool...
And, as you saw, I didn't misread you. I was just correctly adding their being "additions" in a deal wouldn't make much difference to possible trade partners
And I disagree that Flores will bring back minimal return, he's only 23, still some upside there paired with something else, I think they can expect a better piece and it clears a log jam in the infield. Murphy? yes we know what he is and what he'll do he would not bring back much.
Now, you're misreading me. I never said Flores would bring back "minimal return." I correctly said he wouldn't bring much as a difference maker in a deal. Yes, he has value, but teams aren't going to trade a solid hitter with time on his contract because Flores is there. That's why they're asking for the significantly-more-talented Rosario.
.As for Conforto, you are assuming he is ready to contribute at the major league level and team brass didn't think so as little as two weeks ago. The only thing that changed was Cuddyer's worsening condition which forced their hand. I beleive if they can find a full time bat for LF or even a platoon mate for Kelly Johnson ( who I realize doesn't really need one, but you know how managers are) then Mr Conforto head to either Vegas or back to Binghamton for more seasoning.
You're misreading me again...and yet I remain relaxed. See, it can be done... . I never assumed Conforto is ready to contribute. I said if the Mets think he is ready to contribute, then it would be better to acquire someone who wouldn't displace him. If he isn't ready to contribute, then, of course, there is no problem with sending him back down.