- Posts: 2503
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:00 pm
Valen wrote:Just learned something new on the Hamels trade. I went to check how Matt Harrison has done since the trade and his game log showed no games pitched since July 27. Not one pitch thrown for the Phillies. That was strange I thought to myself. Looked at their active roster and no Harrison. Looked at their 40 man and Harrison appeared to be on the 15 day disabled list. What??????
Harrison's shaky health was kind of common knowledge. It's why I hyperbolically joked this in my original analysis of the trade:
l.strether wrote:6. Harrison is obviously a toss-in the Phillies might have had to take for money reason. The man hasn't been healthy since the days of Napster.
How much of that did Rangers know before the trade? How much did they share with Phillies? If Philly knew did Rangers say in order for the quality and quantity of prospects to be included that were Philly would have to take on Matt and be the ones to eat his remaining guaranteed salary.
Injury reports are always above board. I don't know the actual legalities, but anything unkosher on the Rangers side could have nixed the deal. As to Philly having to take Harrison, I already surmised that in my quote above.
If so then this trade is better for the Rangers than I originally thought and one has to start considering it a good deal for Rangers in spite of giving up 5 quality prospects.
Again, I factored that in my original analysis. The Phillies certainly didn't tell the Rangers, "we've got to have Harrison." As to the Rangers giving up "5 quality prospects," I would reduce that to 3 1/2: Alfaro, Williams, Thompson, and Asher (kind of). Eickhoff wasn't even among Texas' top 30 prospects, barely tops 90, and hasn't done well over HIA. He is not in the same league as the other 4.