wow - when did this happen

I'd like to see a page with all manager rankings

http://onlinegames.strat-o-matic.com/member/records

That's just the top 200. You need 50 minimum teams to qualify.

awesome addition, but hopefully they'll tweak the numbers a bit. pitchers can score bronze at 20 wins, 2.00 era, and 200 k's. hitters score bronze at 60 hr's, 150 rbi's, and 100 sb's. the pitcher levels are pretty common. I see them every season. in my just completed league there were 3 20 game winners, 1 sub 2.00 era, and a whopping 27 incidents of 200+ k's. no hitter earned a single bronze trophy. the top hr total was 50, rbi total was 113, and sb total was 60. hopefully they'll make these levels tough but obtainable. gamers love trophies

awesome addition, but hopefully they'll tweak the numbers a bit. pitchers can score bronze at 20 wins, 2.00 era, and 200 k's. hitters score bronze at 60 hr's, 150 rbi's, and 100 sb's. the pitcher levels are pretty common. I see them every season. in my just completed league there were 3 20 game winners, 1 sub 2.00 era, and a whopping 27 incidents of 200+ k's. no hitter earned a single bronze trophy. the top hr total was 50, rbi total was 113, and sb total was 60. hopefully they'll make these levels tough but obtainable. gamers love trophies

agree with this

I'd like to see a page with all manager rankings

http://onlinegames.strat-o-matic.com/member/records

Thanks, and I thought I played a lot, wow

It doesn't look like the "individual pitcher-season" trophies are populating.

I only noticed because I had Troy Glaus get listed for his 152 rbi, but that same team had a 20-game winner and 300k performance, but that pitcher didn't get listed with a trophy.

Anyone else have any pitchers showing up in that section?

I think you are right - mine didn't either.

Anybody out there have teams under two names? I do, stemming from when the game was run by The Sporting News. I am wondering if I gave them my two I.D.s if they could combine my records. I played 37 teams under the old name and 36 teams under the new one. Together I would have enough teams to qualify (over 50) to be among the leaders in winning percentage.

per Geekor:
it's missing 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006 seasons data.

1969 isn't there either