Wed Jan 06, 2016 4:59 am
I understand that "Hal" decided that he should not be named, after all. People other than myself played a direct role in this, but I played an indirect role in terms of my emails back and forth with STRAT over a period of time.
I also exchanged a number of PMs with he who shall not be named. I also think he was a nice person, although I know there were other specific opinions among our online community .
I believe that the decision was (a) in the best interest of the online strat community, and (b) was not made lightly or hastily by Strat. The problem was that he tended to derail many good online discussions, which had a detrimenal effect on those discussions , and on the online community.
I don't think it's bad to ask and for me to reply, but I don't think we should debate the merit of the decision, either. Many have remarked on how the boards are functioning really well in the past few months, and I'm very happy to see that. Let's move on.