Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:53 am
Agreed - actual wins during the season is not the best parameter to measure a team's potential. Salaries are the most important factor if you want a league by "carded" teams.
Here is a list of the 2014 catalog - sorted by total salaries (regular, not the unleashed set) by "carded" teams. The "#" lists the number of players (pitchers and hitters) for each team. There are only 4 teams with total salaries exceeding $85M and you can see that is a stretch because the SOM roster limit is capped at 28.
# Total Salary
LAD 32 91,660,000
LAA 34 90,760,000
OAK 31 90,170,000
BAL 34 85,050,000
WAS 31 84,850,000
PIT 30 84,050,000
SF 34 80,640,000
NYY 32 77,240,000
SEA 33 75,380,000
DET 29 74,970,000
CLE 30 73,820,000
STL 32 73,060,000
CHC 32 71,790,000
TOR 31 71,170,000
COL 30 70,740,000
MIL 30 70,550,000
ATL 27 66,430,000
MIA 31 66,290,000
KC 31 63,130,000
NYM 28 62,930,000
CIN 29 62,260,000
TB 32 61,950,000
HOU 29 61,010,000
MIN 30 59,690,000
SD 33 58,950,000
TEX 34 57,730,000
PHI 30 57,560,000
CHW 27 54,280,000
ARI 32 53,810,000
BOS 26 48,940,000
IMHO, it would be difficult to compete with any of the teams after the top twelve or fourteen teams. Maybe a league of 12 would be a good idea with a one free agent draft as suggested. Or a random draft of team instead of the early birds picking the top teams at the beginning.
Last edited by
Risden on Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.