NSKL Main Thread

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

mlbphan

  • Posts: 3110
  • Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:00 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostMon Feb 15, 2016 8:34 pm

Hudson Royals trade with Midori Marauders

Royals trade C-Yan Gomes, 1B-Lucas Duda, 3B-Mike Moustakas & OF-(prospect)-Michael Taylor to the Marauders

for

OF-Yoenis Cespedes & 2B/SS-Addison Russell

Russ to confirm

thanx,

Rick P
Offline

RUSSIMLER

  • Posts: 121
  • Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:09 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostMon Feb 15, 2016 11:23 pm

I confirm the trade with Rick.

Russ
Offline

mlbphan

  • Posts: 3110
  • Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:00 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostWed Feb 17, 2016 6:11 pm

Hudson Royals trade with Catalina

Royals trade 2B-Brian Dozier & RP Jake McGee to Catalina

for

Catalina's 2016 4th rd & 5th rd FA picks as well as Catalina's 2016 1st rd prospect pick (#12)

Peter to confirm

thanx,

Rick P
Offline

peterdouglas38

  • Posts: 2287
  • Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 1:10 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostWed Feb 17, 2016 6:27 pm

Confirmed.
Offline

mlbphan

  • Posts: 3110
  • Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:00 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostWed Feb 17, 2016 7:48 pm

Hudson Royals trade with Sterling Knights

Royals trade SP-Kyle Gibson & their 2016 5th rd FA pick (NewRays) to the Knights

for

the Knights 2016 2nd rd FA pick

Jay to confirm.

thanx,

Rick P
Offline

JayW527

  • Posts: 538
  • Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:14 pm

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostWed Feb 17, 2016 10:22 pm

Trade between Hudson Royals and Sterling Knights confirmed.

Thanks,
Jay
Offline

JayW527

  • Posts: 538
  • Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:14 pm

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostThu Feb 18, 2016 11:41 pm

New Rule Proposals (2):

#1. Lift the 2 year limit on Prospects.

No longer need to promote or cut prospects after 2 years.

Teams will still be limited to 10 prospects.

Reason: eliminates things for us to track and also provides us with more control of our team's roster.

#2. The team that wins the Championship Series earns 2 additional prospect picks and the losing teams earns 1 additional prospect pick in the next Propect Draft.

These picks would take place in a 4th and 5th round as follows:

Example:
4th Round
1. (Championship Team with best 2 season record 1st pick)
2. (Championship Team with best 2 season record 2nd pick)
3. (Championship Team with worst 2 season record 1st pick)
4. (Championship Team with worst 2 season record 2nd pick)
5th Round
1. (Losing Team with best 2 season record )
2. (Losing Team with worst 2 season record)

If a team is unable to use these additional prospect picks due to the 10 prospect cap they could still trade them prior to the Prospect Draft, otherwise they would forfeit the picks.

Reason: Winning teams are penalized in all the drafts. This generates a chance for a game benefit for the 4 teams that make the playoffs and a real game benefit for the 2 teams that make it to the Championship Series.
Offline

joker329

  • Posts: 2012
  • Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:50 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostFri Feb 19, 2016 8:18 pm

JayW527 wrote:New Rule Proposals (2):

#1. Lift the 2 year limit on Prospects.

No longer need to promote or cut prospects after 2 years.

Teams will still be limited to 10 prospects.

Reason: eliminates things for us to track and also provides us with more control of our team's roster.

#2. The team that wins the Championship Series earns 2 additional prospect picks and the losing teams earns 1 additional prospect pick in the next Propect Draft.

These picks would take place in a 4th and 5th round as follows:

Example:
4th Round
1. (Championship Team with best 2 season record 1st pick)
2. (Championship Team with best 2 season record 2nd pick)
3. (Championship Team with worst 2 season record 1st pick)
4. (Championship Team with worst 2 season record 2nd pick)
5th Round
1. (Losing Team with best 2 season record )
2. (Losing Team with worst 2 season record)

If a team is unable to use these additional prospect picks due to the 10 prospect cap they could still trade them prior to the Prospect Draft, otherwise they would forfeit the picks.

Reason: Winning teams are penalized in all the drafts. This generates a chance for a game benefit for the 4 teams that make the playoffs and a real game benefit for the 2 teams that make it to the Championship Series.



Im ok with number 1

Right now, no on number 2
Offline

mlbphan

  • Posts: 3110
  • Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:00 am

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostFri Feb 19, 2016 9:15 pm

"Unread postThu Feb 18, 2016 10:41 pm

New Rule Proposals (2):

#1. Lift the 2 year limit on Prospects.

No longer need to promote or cut prospects after 2 years.

Teams will still be limited to 10 prospects.

Reason: eliminates things for us to track and also provides us with more control of our team's roster.

#2. The team that wins the Championship Series earns 2 additional prospect picks and the losing teams earns 1 additional prospect pick in the next Propect Draft.

These picks would take place in a 4th and 5th round as follows:

Example:
4th Round
1. (Championship Team with best 2 season record 1st pick)
2. (Championship Team with best 2 season record 2nd pick)
3. (Championship Team with worst 2 season record 1st pick)
4. (Championship Team with worst 2 season record 2nd pick)
5th Round
1. (Losing Team with best 2 season record )
2. (Losing Team with worst 2 season record)

If a team is unable to use these additional prospect picks due to the 10 prospect cap they could still trade them prior to the Prospect Draft, otherwise they would forfeit the picks.

Reason: Winning teams are penalized in all the drafts. This generates a chance for a game benefit for the 4 teams that make the playoffs and a real game benefit for the 2 teams that make it to the Championship Series."


#1 YES

#2 --???--I have more questions for Jay before I can vote one way or the other on this one.

thanx,

Rick P
Last edited by mlbphan on Sat Feb 20, 2016 10:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Offline

rzepernick

  • Posts: 245
  • Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:36 pm

Re: NSKL Main Thread

PostSat Feb 20, 2016 11:18 am

I also am OK with proposal number 1. It seems like it makes management a little easier.

But, number 2 seems to me that it makes management a little more complicated.

I guess complicated stuff is getting harder for me to handle
PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests