Deja Vu League -- Season 28

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

lakeviewdave

  • Posts: 8701
  • Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:56 pm
  • Location: Wake Forest, NC

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostSun May 22, 2016 4:45 pm

tcochran wrote:With 2 picks in the 1st rd and one in the 2nd, I bet you're already planning to kick 3 of those "top 25" to the curb anyhow, right?
[/quote]

What does this even mean? Planning to kick 3 of those top 25 to the curb?

If I have to get to 20, instead of 25, the following would become unprotected, and some of these would be in top 25-28 with injuries, expanded rosters, etc. Others make for some possible deals

Ian Desmond
Martin Prado
Chris Young
Chris Bassitt
Ken Giles
Kendrys Morales
Garrett Richards
Last edited by lakeviewdave on Sun May 22, 2016 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Offline

jflatour99

  • Posts: 5063
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:48 pm
  • Location: Sorel, Québec

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostSun May 22, 2016 5:38 pm

BROWNFIELD RECLAMATION PROJECT

In a desperate attempt to return to the playoffs for the first time since the league's first season (which he did), CATom has traded away all of his top picks for the next two years:
1st rd pick, '15
2nd rd pick, '15
3rd rd pick, '15
1st pros '15
2nd pros '15
1st rd supp, '15
1st rd pick, '16
1st rd pros, '16
2nd rd pros, '16

In order to find a manager willing to rehabilitate the damaged CATom franchise, I suggest that the league offer the following incentives:

a. The current roster has 41 players on it, including a few diamonds-in-the-rough and a bunch a bums. Let's allow the new manager to drop as many as he wishes.

b. For the upcoming free agent draft, let's allow each team to drop players to the standard max 30/min 25 roster limits and to then protect 20 of the remaining players. The new manager may then select up to one player from the unprotected players on each active roster (or from a team's drop list, if desired).

c. After keeping some of the current players and selecting up to 11 unprotected ones from the other 11 teams, the new manager may have an active roster as large as he wishes at the start of the draft (up to a max of 40).

d. For the supplemental draft in both the 2015 and 2016 card sets, let's allow the new manager to drop up to 3 players (instead of 2) and have an automatic, extra 1st pick prior to the start of the rest of the supp draft.

e. The current roster has 0 prospects and the team has no prospect picks for the next two years. Let's allow an extra prospect pick at the end of each round of the next two prospect drafts.

* * * * *

Shall we offer this incentive package to a new manager?

1. tcochran - YES
2. padrenurgle - YES
3. alk58 - Yes
4. Lakeviewdave - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
5. thechamp87 - YES
6. Dr.Publix - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
7. jflatour99 - a BIG YES (let's remember that we'd only lose 1 player and if we want to find a manager, we must "give a little bit" like Hodgson would say.)
8.
9.
10.
11.
Offline

lakeviewdave

  • Posts: 8701
  • Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:56 pm
  • Location: Wake Forest, NC

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostSun May 22, 2016 8:34 pm

Drops (13)

Chris Iannetta
Devin Mesoraco
Kris Negron
Alex Rios
Justin Ruggiano
Danny Santana
Kennys Vargas
Jayson Werth
Andrew Cashner
Sean Doolittle
Pat Neshek
Anibal Sanchez
Edison Volquez

Promotions (2)
Kris Bryant
Joc Pederson

38-13+2=27, 13 picks
Offline

lakeviewdave

  • Posts: 8701
  • Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:56 pm
  • Location: Wake Forest, NC

Re: Deja Vu League

PostSun May 22, 2016 8:59 pm

Available to be dealt.

Justin Upton LF $5.08
Kendrys Morales 1B $6.22
Nick Hundley C $3.84
Martin Prado 3B/2B $3.79
Chris Bassitt SP $3.72
Tyson Ross SP* $4.54
Garrett Richards SP* $4.19
Ian Desmond
Chris Young

Looking for SP for future, upgraded draft picks, LF/ RF, pros picks
Offline

tcochran

  • Posts: 17027
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:23 pm

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostSun May 22, 2016 9:57 pm

BROWNFIELD RECLAMATION PROJECT

In a desperate attempt to return to the playoffs for the first time since the league's first season (which he did), CATom has traded away all of his top picks for the next two years:
1st rd pick, '15
2nd rd pick, '15
3rd rd pick, '15
1st pros '15
2nd pros '15
1st rd supp, '15
1st rd pick, '16
1st rd pros, '16
2nd rd pros, '16

In order to find a manager willing to rehabilitate the damaged CATom franchise, I suggest that the league offer the following incentives:

a. The current roster has 41 players on it, including a few diamonds-in-the-rough and a bunch a bums. Let's allow the new manager to drop as many as he wishes.

b. For the upcoming free agent draft, let's allow each team to drop players to the standard max 30/min 25 roster limits and to then protect 20 of the remaining players. The new manager may then select up to one player from the unprotected players on each active roster (or from a team's drop list, if desired).

c. After keeping some of the current players and selecting up to 11 unprotected ones from the other 11 teams, the new manager may have an active roster as large as he wishes at the start of the draft (up to a max of 40).

d. For the supplemental draft in both the 2015 and 2016 card sets, let's allow the new manager to drop up to 3 players (instead of 2) and have an automatic, extra 1st pick prior to the start of the rest of the supp draft.

e. The current roster has 0 prospects and the team has no prospect picks for the next two years. Let's allow an extra prospect pick at the end of each round of the next two prospect drafts.

* * * * *

Shall we offer this incentive package to a new manager?

1. tcochran - YES
2. padrenurgle - YES
3. alk58 - Yes
4. Lakeviewdave - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
5. thechamp87 - YES
6. Dr.Publix - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
7. jflatour99 - a BIG YES (let's remember that we'd only lose 1 player and if we want to find a manager, we must "give a little bit" like Hodgson would say.)
8. WJS6768
9. JMP1
10. jodynadu
11. tpiercersn
Offline

WJS6768

  • Posts: 4419
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:26 pm

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostMon May 23, 2016 5:46 am

BROWNFIELD RECLAMATION PROJECT

In a desperate attempt to return to the playoffs for the first time since the league's first season (which he did), CATom has traded away all of his top picks for the next two years:
1st rd pick, '15
2nd rd pick, '15
3rd rd pick, '15
1st pros '15
2nd pros '15
1st rd supp, '15
1st rd pick, '16
1st rd pros, '16
2nd rd pros, '16

In order to find a manager willing to rehabilitate the damaged CATom franchise, I suggest that the league offer the following incentives:

a. The current roster has 41 players on it, including a few diamonds-in-the-rough and a bunch a bums. Let's allow the new manager to drop as many as he wishes.

b. For the upcoming free agent draft, let's allow each team to drop players to the standard max 30/min 25 roster limits and to then protect 20 of the remaining players. The new manager may then select up to one player from the unprotected players on each active roster (or from a team's drop list, if desired).

c. After keeping some of the current players and selecting up to 11 unprotected ones from the other 11 teams, the new manager may have an active roster as large as he wishes at the start of the draft (up to a max of 40).

d. For the supplemental draft in both the 2015 and 2016 card sets, let's allow the new manager to drop up to 3 players (instead of 2) and have an automatic, extra 1st pick prior to the start of the rest of the supp draft.

e. The current roster has 0 prospects and the team has no prospect picks for the next two years. Let's allow an extra prospect pick at the end of each round of the next two prospect drafts.

* * * * *

Shall we offer this incentive package to a new manager?

1. tcochran - YES
2. padrenurgle - YES
3. alk58 - Yes
4. Lakeviewdave - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
5. thechamp87 - YES
6. Dr.Publix - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
7. jflatour99 - a BIG YES (let's remember that we'd only lose 1 player and if we want to find a manager, we must "give a little bit" like Hodgson would say.)
8. WJS6768 - Yes
9. JMP1
10. jodynadu
11. tpiercersn
Offline

tcochran

  • Posts: 17027
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:23 pm

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostMon May 23, 2016 11:43 pm

bump

currently at 6 yes, 2 no
Offline

JMP1

  • Posts: 3013
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:30 pm

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostTue May 24, 2016 7:14 am

BROWNFIELD RECLAMATION PROJECT

In a desperate attempt to return to the playoffs for the first time since the league's first season (which he did), CATom has traded away all of his top picks for the next two years:
1st rd pick, '15
2nd rd pick, '15
3rd rd pick, '15
1st pros '15
2nd pros '15
1st rd supp, '15
1st rd pick, '16
1st rd pros, '16
2nd rd pros, '16

In order to find a manager willing to rehabilitate the damaged CATom franchise, I suggest that the league offer the following incentives:

a. The current roster has 41 players on it, including a few diamonds-in-the-rough and a bunch a bums. Let's allow the new manager to drop as many as he wishes.

b. For the upcoming free agent draft, let's allow each team to drop players to the standard max 30/min 25 roster limits and to then protect 20 of the remaining players. The new manager may then select up to one player from the unprotected players on each active roster (or from a team's drop list, if desired).

c. After keeping some of the current players and selecting up to 11 unprotected ones from the other 11 teams, the new manager may have an active roster as large as he wishes at the start of the draft (up to a max of 40).

d. For the supplemental draft in both the 2015 and 2016 card sets, let's allow the new manager to drop up to 3 players (instead of 2) and have an automatic, extra 1st pick prior to the start of the rest of the supp draft.

e. The current roster has 0 prospects and the team has no prospect picks for the next two years. Let's allow an extra prospect pick at the end of each round of the next two prospect drafts.

* * * * *

Shall we offer this incentive package to a new manager?

1. tcochran - YES
2. padrenurgle - YES
3. alk58 - Yes
4. Lakeviewdave - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
5. thechamp87 - YES
6. Dr.Publix - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
7. jflatour99 - a BIG YES (let's remember that we'd only lose 1 player and if we want to find a manager, we must "give a little bit" like Hodgson would say.)
8. WJS6768 - Yes
9. JMP1 - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
10. jodynadu
11. tpiercersn
Offline

tpiercersn@aol.com

  • Posts: 1185
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:36 pm

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostWed May 25, 2016 12:24 pm

BROWNFIELD RECLAMATION PROJECT

In a desperate attempt to return to the playoffs for the first time since the league's first season (which he did), CATom has traded away all of his top picks for the next two years:
1st rd pick, '15
2nd rd pick, '15
3rd rd pick, '15
1st pros '15
2nd pros '15
1st rd supp, '15
1st rd pick, '16
1st rd pros, '16
2nd rd pros, '16

In order to find a manager willing to rehabilitate the damaged CATom franchise, I suggest that the league offer the following incentives:

a. The current roster has 41 players on it, including a few diamonds-in-the-rough and a bunch a bums. Let's allow the new manager to drop as many as he wishes.

b. For the upcoming free agent draft, let's allow each team to drop players to the standard max 30/min 25 roster limits and to then protect 20 of the remaining players. The new manager may then select up to one player from the unprotected players on each active roster (or from a team's drop list, if desired).

c. After keeping some of the current players and selecting up to 11 unprotected ones from the other 11 teams, the new manager may have an active roster as large as he wishes at the start of the draft (up to a max of 40).

d. For the supplemental draft in both the 2015 and 2016 card sets, let's allow the new manager to drop up to 3 players (instead of 2) and have an automatic, extra 1st pick prior to the start of the rest of the supp draft.

e. The current roster has 0 prospects and the team has no prospect picks for the next two years. Let's allow an extra prospect pick at the end of each round of the next two prospect drafts.

* * * * *

Shall we offer this incentive package to a new manager?

1. tcochran - YES
2. padrenurgle - YES
3. alk58 - Yes
4. Lakeviewdave - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
5. thechamp87 - YES
6. Dr.Publix - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
7. jflatour99 - a BIG YES (let's remember that we'd only lose 1 player and if we want to find a manager, we must "give a little bit" like Hodgson would say.)
8. WJS6768 - Yes
9. JMP1 - NO (because of 20 protected, YES if 25 protected)
10. jodynadu
11. tpiercersn[/quote]. No (to 20 protected, yes if 25)
Offline

tcochran

  • Posts: 17027
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:23 pm

Re: Deja Vu League -- Vote on Brownfield Reclamation Project

PostWed May 25, 2016 1:02 pm

OK, so protecting 20 can now only get a max of 7 votes, so that part fails.

Protecting 25 seems acceptable to all 10 managers who have voted, so the following will be posted in the call for a replacement manager


* * * * *

Replacement manager needed in the Deja Vu League. CATom has abandoned a third rotten team -- and this one is the worst one (so far). See league Google doc at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... 1274361238

BROWNFIELD RECLAMATION PROJECT

In a desperate attempt to return to the playoffs for the first time since the league's first season (which he did), CATom traded away all of his top picks for the next two years:
1st rd pick, '15
2nd rd pick, '15
3rd rd pick, '15
1st pros '15
2nd pros '15
1st rd supp, '15
1st rd pick, '16
1st rd pros, '16
2nd rd pros, '16

In order to find a manager willing to rehabilitate the damaged CATom franchise, the league is offering the following incentives:

a. The current roster has 41 players on it, including a few diamonds-in-the-rough and a bunch a bums. The new manager may drop as many as he wishes before the annual free agent draft.

b. For the upcoming free agent draft, each of the other teams will drop players to the standard max 30/min 25 roster limits and then protect 25 of the remaining players. The new manager may then select up to one player from the unprotected players on each active roster (or from a team's drop list, if desired).

c. After keeping some of the current players and selecting up to 11 unprotected ones from the other 11 teams, the new manager may have an active roster as large as he wishes at the start of the draft (up to a max of 40).

d. For the supplemental draft in both the 2015 and 2016 card sets, the new manager may drop up to 3 players (instead of 2) and have an automatic, extra 1st pick prior to the start of the rest of the supp draft.

e. The current roster has 0 prospects and the team has no prospect picks for the next two years. An extra prospect pick will be allowed at the end of each round of the next two prospect drafts.
PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests